2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-35552010000600013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptação transcultural para o Brasil do Sistema de Classificação da Função Motora Grossa (GMFCS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
11

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
31
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…An increase in level indicates greater impairment; thus, Level I is the mildest (no restrictions but with limitations in some movements), and Level V is the most severe (the child is transported in a wheelchair and exhibits many limitations even with the use of assistive technology) (Russell, Rosenbaum, Avery, & Lane, 2011). The crosscultural adaptation of the GMFCS for Brazil was performed by Hiratuka, Matsukura, and Pfeifer (2010). The results indicated semantic and conceptual equivalence, sufficient inter-rater reliability, excellent construct correlation, and internal consistency, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of .945 and a Cronbach's alpha of .972.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…An increase in level indicates greater impairment; thus, Level I is the mildest (no restrictions but with limitations in some movements), and Level V is the most severe (the child is transported in a wheelchair and exhibits many limitations even with the use of assistive technology) (Russell, Rosenbaum, Avery, & Lane, 2011). The crosscultural adaptation of the GMFCS for Brazil was performed by Hiratuka, Matsukura, and Pfeifer (2010). The results indicated semantic and conceptual equivalence, sufficient inter-rater reliability, excellent construct correlation, and internal consistency, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of .945 and a Cronbach's alpha of .972.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In this study, we found substantial agreement among students (Group 3) or professionals of the same area, with up to two years of experience (Group 2), when they classified the motor level of children using the Brazilian version of the GMFCS E&R. In most studies, the agreement in the classification of the GMFCS has also been substantial, with kappa coefficient raging between 0.64 and 0.80 4,9,12 , involving different health professionals (physical therapists 4,10,12,14,17 , doctors 8,9,10,17 , occupational therapists 4,5 , speech therapists 10 , and nurses 10 ) and different methods of collecting information to classify the gross motor function using the GMFCS or GMFCS E & R (direct observation 4,8,9,12,16 , questioning of parents 12,16 , review of medical records 7,8,23 ). Indexes of agreement quite similar to the students' group of this research (Group 3) were obtained in other studies, but with more experienced professionals 8,10,12,23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morris and Bartlett 18 mention that the use of videos of GMFCS allows students to understand that cerebral palsy comprises more than one motor type or topographical distribution, and show that a child with quadriplegia (bilateral spastic CP) can be classified into different levels of GMFCS (II, III, IV or V) 18 . Although the GMFCS and the GMFCS E&R consist in classifications of easy application, studies that assess their reliability in Brazil are scarce 5,19 and did not verify their validity with other health professionals with different levels of experience in the area (strata) 20 , including undergraduate students, who are involved in the treatment of children with cerebral palsy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the Portuguese version (Brazil) of the GMFCS E&R for students and health professionals (physical and occupational therapists), with different levels of experience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The World Health Organization recommends the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of existing instruments of evaluation, because this improves communication between researchers and permits comparison of data obtained internationally 9,12 . Furthermore, the use of validated instruments increases confidence in the measurements obtained 9 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%