2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-583x(01)01227-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activation and dopant sites of ultra-shallow implanted boron and arsenic in silicon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, an understanding of the atomic structures of dopants in semiconductors would assist in the development of new process technologies for the fabrication of high-performance devices. For this reason, atomic level dopant structures have been investigated using both theoretical and experimental approaches, although the direct observation of the three-dimensional (3D) structures of dopant arrangements has been difficult to achieve. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and electron diffraction are powerful methods of visualizing 3D atomic structures; however, these techniques are only applicable to crystalline structures and cannot be applied to the visualization of dopant structures because the dopants are not dispersed with a regular periodicity in the crystal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As such, an understanding of the atomic structures of dopants in semiconductors would assist in the development of new process technologies for the fabrication of high-performance devices. For this reason, atomic level dopant structures have been investigated using both theoretical and experimental approaches, although the direct observation of the three-dimensional (3D) structures of dopant arrangements has been difficult to achieve. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and electron diffraction are powerful methods of visualizing 3D atomic structures; however, these techniques are only applicable to crystalline structures and cannot be applied to the visualization of dopant structures because the dopants are not dispersed with a regular periodicity in the crystal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X-ray diffraction (XRD) and electron diffraction are powerful methods of visualizing 3D atomic structures; however, these techniques are only applicable to crystalline structures and cannot be applied to the visualization of dopant structures because the dopants are not dispersed with a regular periodicity in the crystal. X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) can provide information regarding dopants, although only with respect to the atomic distance. ,, In addition, ion scattering can be used to detect the positions of target atoms relative to crystalline matrix channels. High-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) has also been used to image individual dopant atoms in real space and has provided data regarding the formation of dopant clusters. , The determination of the 3D structure of the dopant has also been attempted . In principle, however, direct imaging for light elements or cases involving vacancies is difficult.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FA samples show a more pronounced effect due to the longer annealing time, which allows the formation of a larger number of these complexes. For longer annealing times the As n V complex concentration increases as well as the As fraction in them, which means increasing n. 10 As mentioned previously, 11 As atoms are electrically inactive when bound to a vacancy. This dopant deactivation process is most significant after the implantation damage has been removed by annealing and when the dopants start to form complexes with vacancies and clusters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This dopant deactivation process is most significant after the implantation damage has been removed by annealing and when the dopants start to form complexes with vacancies and clusters. 10,11 Another interesting feature is the lower damage level in the SIMOX samples after RTA compared to bulk Si, as can be seen in the RBS channeled spectrum of the As peak in Fig. 2(a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation