2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A theoretical and experimental assessment of 3D macroscopic failure criteria for predicting pure inter-fiber fracture of transversely isotropic UD composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The challenges with 3-D printed materials arise from the lack of consistency, and 3-D printed materials can differ from model to model due to variables such as printing direction and fill density. For instance, in Gu et al's publication on composite structures, there is an increased risk due to the complexity from high anisotropy and a variety of failure modes [52]. For simplicity, the Von Mises failure criterion is commonly used on 3-D printed materials, however, it assumes the material to be isotropic [52].…”
Section: Finite Element Analysis Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The challenges with 3-D printed materials arise from the lack of consistency, and 3-D printed materials can differ from model to model due to variables such as printing direction and fill density. For instance, in Gu et al's publication on composite structures, there is an increased risk due to the complexity from high anisotropy and a variety of failure modes [52]. For simplicity, the Von Mises failure criterion is commonly used on 3-D printed materials, however, it assumes the material to be isotropic [52].…”
Section: Finite Element Analysis Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in Gu et al's publication on composite structures, there is an increased risk due to the complexity from high anisotropy and a variety of failure modes [52]. For simplicity, the Von Mises failure criterion is commonly used on 3-D printed materials, however, it assumes the material to be isotropic [52]. In this study, the Tsai-Wu failure criterion was more suitable since 3-D printed and composite materials are inherently anisotropic, and Tsai-Wu is a generally acceptable failure criterion for anisotropic materials.…”
Section: Finite Element Analysis Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These directional properties were assigned to the RVE cube homogeneously representing the pure composite section, which are also based on experimental tests (Table 1, Figure 5A,C). The Tsai-Hill failure criterion with some modifications made by Hoffman given by Equation ( 7) [60] was considered for pinpointing the onset of composite's elements failure during quasi-static tensile test simulation.…”
Section: Fe Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameters X T , X C , Y T , Y C , S 12 , and S 23 show ultimate tensile and compression strength along fiber direction, tensile and compression strength in the direction being perpendicular to the fibers, xy and yz local shears, respectively. Moreover, for LVI simulation the 3D Hashin failure criterion (Equations 8 and 9) [60] ) was chosen to designate matrix failure mode since during this test composite's matrix is more likely to be damaged. [61] For the healing process, it is assumed that if the composite's degraded elements were in the distance of 78 μm (the maximum distance that a microcapsule with a 600 μm diameter is able to heal) from the ruptured microcapsules, their mechanical properties would be switched to FV-3, meaning that their properties being perpendicular to the fibers' direction would be recovered.…”
Section: Fe Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35][36][37][38] The buckling model [39,40] of composite laminates is established theoretically, which is beneficial to the structural design of beams. The bearing capacity verification forms of C-beam include four-point bending, [41] shearing and coupled loading. However, the mentioned loading methods may only be the single load (single bending or single shear), or the nonadjustable coupling ratio (three-point bending).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%