2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2005.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic approach to the synthesis and design of flexible site utility systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the optimal configuration of these systems still represents a complex problem due to the wide variety of technological options for energy supply and conversion and the large daily and annual variations in energy demands and in energy prices and rates. According to Shang and Kokossis [20], variability in energy demand requires a project methodology that results in efficient production systems (thermodynamic objective) that are able to adapt to different demand and market conditions (operational flexibility) and can operate with minimal economic costs.Although the quantification of biomass use is a challenge, due to non-commercial uses, it is estimated that it can represent up to 14% of global primary energy consumption; in some developing countries, …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the optimal configuration of these systems still represents a complex problem due to the wide variety of technological options for energy supply and conversion and the large daily and annual variations in energy demands and in energy prices and rates. According to Shang and Kokossis [20], variability in energy demand requires a project methodology that results in efficient production systems (thermodynamic objective) that are able to adapt to different demand and market conditions (operational flexibility) and can operate with minimal economic costs.Although the quantification of biomass use is a challenge, due to non-commercial uses, it is estimated that it can represent up to 14% of global primary energy consumption; in some developing countries, …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method decomposes complex turbines into a number of simple turbines, allows for variations in turbine efficiency at full and part load and optimises the range of options. The total site profiles and turbine network models are the basis of many methods (Klemes et al, 1997;Varbanov et al, 2004aVarbanov et al, , 2004bBandyopadhyay et al, 2010;Gorsek et al, 2006;Shang and Kokossis, 2005) for top level analysis and optimisation of utility systems. All of these methods are designed for optimisation of utility systems including cogeneration of heat and power rather than trying to minimise the energy penalty associated with retrofitting a single power station with additional heat sources and sinks.…”
Section: Methods For Selection Of Optimum Utilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subject to: X s a s ¼ 1 (17) With the inclusion of a s in Equation (16), the economic feasibility of the BTS in all s potential scenarios is evaluated via multiperiod optimisation. Multi-period optimisation has been applied to synthesise utility systems, taking into account varying energy demands [30,31], equipment downtime [4,32] and environmental impact [33]. Besides utility systems, multi-period optimisation has been used to synthesise polygeneration systems [34,35] and heat exchanger networks [36,37].…”
Section: Economic Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%