1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00366.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple method for measuring penile length in newborns and infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Not all previous studies include information on measurement variation, and there are various techniques available. Many studies have used 'stretched' penile length (10), which has also been reported to have a considerable inter-observer variation (11). We found that the method used in our study was highly acceptable to both children and parents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Not all previous studies include information on measurement variation, and there are various techniques available. Many studies have used 'stretched' penile length (10), which has also been reported to have a considerable inter-observer variation (11). We found that the method used in our study was highly acceptable to both children and parents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…However, the SPL method is insufficient at accurately measuring penile length in children with an inconspicuous penis. Another option for penile measurement involves the use of a 10-ml disposable syringe [12,13]. This method eliminates measurement variability caused by a suprapubic fat pad, but it does not involve stretching of the penis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15] In summary, median SPL measurement of children of diverse races and ethnicities reported in various literature studies has ranged from 2.31 cm to 3.75 cm. [10,[15][16][17][18][19][20] In gold-standard study by Schonfeld and Beebe, [10] mean SPL was 3.75±0.3 cm, while Feldman and Smith [21] and Flatau et al reported mean SPL measurements of 3.5±0.7 cm and 3.5±0.4 cm, respectively. [22] In studies performed in various Asian countries, including Singapore and Saudi Arabia, comparable mean SPLs were obtained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…[22] In studies performed in various Asian countries, including Singapore and Saudi Arabia, comparable mean SPLs were obtained. [14][15][16][17] However, markedly lower mean SPL has been reported in studies performed on babies born in Indonesia, China, and Japan. [18][19][20] In a study by Fok et al [20] performed with Chinese children, significant correlation was found between SPL and body weight, height, and gestational age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%