1982
DOI: 10.1139/z82-105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A revision of the congrogadid fish genus Halidesmus (Pisces: Perciformes), with the description of a new species from Kenya and a list of the species included in the family

Abstract: The genus Halidesmus is unique within the Congrogadidae in the possession of three lateral lines. The three species are described, diagnosed, and illustrated, and a key to the species is provided. One of these species, from Kenya, is described as new and is distinguished from the other two species in lacking scales on the cheek and nape, in having 11 suborbital pores, and in the degree of development and form of the lateral lines and associated pores. A tentative hypothesis of relationships is proposed, based … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1990. Winterbottom (1982) recorded the range of H. thomaseni as extending from Karachi, Pakistan, to the Bay of Bengal. Material collected since that time extends the range westward to the southeastern coast of Oman at Masirah Island, a scant 600 km east of the collection site of H. coccus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1990. Winterbottom (1982) recorded the range of H. thomaseni as extending from Karachi, Pakistan, to the Bay of Bengal. Material collected since that time extends the range westward to the southeastern coast of Oman at Masirah Island, a scant 600 km east of the collection site of H. coccus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new species differs from H. thomaseni in having usually more dorsal-fin rays (64-68 vs. 58-64), anal-fin rays (52-55 vs. 45-50), pectoral-fin rays (10 vs. 7-9), caudal (5 1-55 vs. 45-49), and total (69-73 vs. 64-68) vertebrae; fewer gill rakers on the lower limb of the first gill arch (5-6 vs. 6-7); and no scales on the cheek, opercle, nape, or above the dorsal lateral line (vs. scales present). The figure of the head pores of H. thomaseni presented by Winterbottom (1982) contains three errors. The uppermost pore labelled as belonging to the preopercular series is, in fact, the intertemporal (and there are thus 7, not 8, preopercular pores).…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…commun.]. The multiple pattern ap pears to be a derivative of a single trunk canal (with the addition of new canals), or of a disjunct pattern (with the rostral extension of the caudal portion of the trunk canal as in the Congrogadinae [127,128] and Cichlidae [67]). In addition, the systematic distribu tion of the dorsal and multiple patterns within orders does not overlap [17,67].…”
Section: Morphology Evolution and Adaptation Of The Trunk Canalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It occurs only within the order Perciformes, and prominently in three suborders: the labroid families Cichlidae, Pomacentridae and Labridae (including the Scarinae and Odacinae as subfamilies of the Labridae, as defined by Kaufman and Liem [129]), the serranoid families Grammidae, Pseudochromidae (subfamilies Pseudochrominae, Congrogadinae [127,128]), Grammistidae (subfamily Pseudogrammitinae [73]) and Pleisiopidae [130], and the anabantoid families Helostomatidae and Anabantidae [73]. The disjunct pat tern also occurs in the Nandidae (the sister group to the Anabantoidei [131]), Channichthyidae, Champsodontidae, Zoarcidae, Opisthognathidae, Bythidae and Notothenoididae [72, 73; McAllister, pers.…”
Section: Morphology Evolution and Adaptation Of The Trunk Canalsmentioning
confidence: 99%