Morphology and ontogeny of multiple lateral-line canals in the rock prickleback,Xiphister mucosus(Cottiformes: Zoarcoidei: Stichaeidae)

Abstract

The structure and ontogeny of lateral-line canals in the Rock Prickleback, Xiphister mucosus, were studied using cleared-and-stained specimens, and the distribution and morphology of neuromasts within lateral-line canals were examined using histology. X. mucosus has seven cephalic canals in a pattern that, aside from four branches of the infraorbital canals, is similar to that of most teleostean fishes. Unlike most other teleosts, however, X. mucosus features multiple trunk lateral-line canals. These include a short median posterior extension of the supratemporal canal and three paired, branching canals located on the dorsolateral, mediolateral, and ventrolateral surfaces. The ventrolateral canal (VLC) includes a loop across the ventral surface of the abdomen. All trunk canals, as well as the branches of the infraorbitals, are supported by small, dermal, ring-like ossifications that develop independently from scales. Trunk canals develop asynchronously with the mediodorsal and dorsolateral canals (DLC) developing earliest, followed by the VLC, and, finally, by the mediolateral canal (MLC). Only the mediodorsal and DLC connect to the cephalic sensory canals. Fractal analysis shows that the complexity of the trunk lateral-line canals stabilizes when all trunk canals develop and begin to branch. Histological sections show that neuromasts are present in all cephalic canals and in the DLC and MLC of the trunk. However, no neuromasts were identified in the VLC or its abdominal loop. The VLC cannot, therefore, directly function as a part of the mechanosensory system in X. mucosus. The evolution and functional role of multiple lateral-line canals are discussed.

New Interpretation of the 3-D Configuration of Lateral Line Scales and the Lateral Line Canal Contained within Them

“…The lateral line scales themselves demonstrate a good deal of interspecific variation (Voronina, 2007;Voronina and Hughes, 2017), some of which can be explained by changes in developmental timing (Voronina and Hughes, 2013). Furthermore, morphological variation is found between scales in the rostral and caudal portions of the trunk canal in some taxa (e.g., labrids; Webb, 1990), among the multiple trunk canals in Hexagrammos (Wonsettler and Webb, 1997) and Xiphister (Clardy et al, 2015), and between the trunk canals on the eyed versus the blind side of the body in flatfishes (e.g., Voronina, 2009aVoronina, , 2009b.…”