1968
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1968)096<0540:artffh>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Revised Technique for Forecasting Hurricane Movement by Statistical Methods

Abstract: The NHC-64 statistical equations for predicting the movement of hurricanes have been in operational use for 4 yr. These equations have continued to perform well. Following the 1966 hurricane season, however, it was apparent that the equations could be improved. A new forecast technique, based on additional data and additional predictors, has been derived. Tests on independent data for 1966 and on an operational basis during 1967 indicate that the 1967 method is slightly superior t o NHC-64.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean errors in the forecast for 1967 were considerably lower than those in 1966 for both areas B and c. length of the forecast period mas changed slightly beginning in 1967 which makes comparison of results with those of earlier years awkward, and 3) a new and improved objective technique, NHC-67 [8], was used for the first time as an aid by the forecasters, and it is believed that 1 yr. is too short a time to evaluate its impact on the official forecasts. One might argue that the storms were easier to forecast in the latter periods.…”
Section: Results Of the Forecast Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The mean errors in the forecast for 1967 were considerably lower than those in 1966 for both areas B and c. length of the forecast period mas changed slightly beginning in 1967 which makes comparison of results with those of earlier years awkward, and 3) a new and improved objective technique, NHC-67 [8], was used for the first time as an aid by the forecasters, and it is believed that 1 yr. is too short a time to evaluate its impact on the official forecasts. One might argue that the storms were easier to forecast in the latter periods.…”
Section: Results Of the Forecast Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Trough stratification, the forecast is adapted to the climatological differences of these two zones. Moreover predictors are selected in different order and/or different weights are assigned to the different predictors to forecast slow (between 13 and 24 km/h) and fast moving cyclones (more than 24 km/h) (Miller et al, 1968). In contrast the stratification methods used by NHC72 and EPHC77 split the predictor datasets with respect to the initial direction of motion of the cyclone.…”
Section: Chen-elsberrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sub-system 2: Forecast from steering methods using 1000, 700, and 500 mbar geopotential heights as steering levels (Miller et al, 1968). Sub-system 3: Forecast from synoptic techniques, where 24, 36, and 48 hour geopotentialheight prognoses from the NMC primitive equation model are used (Shuman and Hovermale, 1968).…”
Section: National Hurricane Center Statistical-dynamical Technique Sementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model is the baseline by which model skill is evaluated. 3) NHC67, or A67E [run operationally 1967-87;Miller et al (1968)], was an update of the statistical-synoptic NHC64 model (Miller and Case 1966). The locations in which the geopotential heights in the current and 24-h-old 1000-, 700-, and 500-hPa analyses are most significantly correlated with future motion were found.…”
Section: The Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%