2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of abortion laws in Western-European countries. A cross-national comparison of legal developments between 1960 and 2010

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
48
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The report, in fact, included the countries where abortion was legal and in which circumstances abortion would be allowed. (Levels, Sluiter & Need, 2014;UN, 2014a). The countries' abortion laws are categorized as below:…”
Section: Abortion Policies Around the Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The report, in fact, included the countries where abortion was legal and in which circumstances abortion would be allowed. (Levels, Sluiter & Need, 2014;UN, 2014a). The countries' abortion laws are categorized as below:…”
Section: Abortion Policies Around the Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Legal abortion frame is always in the best interest of feminists as it is naturally about women's selfautonomy on their body and fertility. The legal limitation on abortion is perceived by many as a threat to hardly earned women rights (Levels, Sluiter & Need, 2014).…”
Section: Abortion Policies Around the Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research into policy innovations has been concentrating primarily on cross-national differences including research among European countries (Baturo & Gray, 2009;Bol, Pilet, & Riera, 2015;Gerven, Vanhercke, & Gürocak, 2014;Gilardi, 2008Gilardi, , 2010Lee & Strang, 2006;Levels, Sluiter, & Need, 2014;Toshkov, 2013) and Latin-American countries (Sugiyama, 2011;Weyland, 2005Weyland, , 2009, or on research across countries world-wide (Brooks, , 2007Calista & Melitski, 2013;Simmons & Elkins, 2004). At the subnational level, the focus is on the study of innovations in federal states, which almost always consists of American research into differences in innovativeness among the American States (Allard, 2004;Baybeck, Berry, & Siegel, 2011;Boushey, 2010;Jensen, 2004;Mintrom, 1997;Nicholson-Crotty, 2009;Shipan & Volden, 2008;Taylor, Lewis, Jacobsmeier, & DiSarro, 2012;.…”
Section: Progress In the Selection Of The Empirical Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Europe, and globally there is substantial variation in legal access to termination of pregnancies which influences reproductive medicine practices [3,4]. However, health professionals working in contemporary foetal medicine and genetics settings in the UK are accustomed to offering PND and termination for conditions that present early in life; exhibit high to complete penetrance; and have limited effective treatments [1,2] 1 .…”
Section: Usual Practices In the Ukmentioning
confidence: 99%