2021
DOI: 10.1057/s41599-021-00847-1
| View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Science diplomacy (SD) is an emerging field of study at the intersection of international relations and science policy. Despite such a growing interest, the region of Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe has received limited attention by the scholars studying this increasingly significant topic. This article presents the preliminary results of a research focusing on international scientific collaborations between the countries that are members of the Central European Initiative (CEI), an intergovernmental… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Without clarity on the regulatory status of GE crops in the international treaty process, efforts to harmonize regulations will be more difficult and can lead to institutional drift [ 50 ]. The benefits of international GEd policy harmonization may be achieved more rapidly through negotiation simulations, science policy/diplomacy education [ 51 ], policy advocacy platforms [ 52 ], and grant structures [ 53 ].…”
Section: The Commercialization Of Ge Crops In Asia and Australiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without clarity on the regulatory status of GE crops in the international treaty process, efforts to harmonize regulations will be more difficult and can lead to institutional drift [ 50 ]. The benefits of international GEd policy harmonization may be achieved more rapidly through negotiation simulations, science policy/diplomacy education [ 51 ], policy advocacy platforms [ 52 ], and grant structures [ 53 ].…”
Section: The Commercialization Of Ge Crops In Asia and Australiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incorporation of various entities is mirrored in the acknowledgement of a diversity of science diplomacy actors hosted both at the institutions with more top-down steering functions (intergovernmental example of Arnaldi et al, 2021), as well as bottom-up advocacy (Aaserud, 2020;Raev & Minkman, 2020, p. 8;Šime, 2021c, p. 2). However science diplomacy stands in stark contrast to the diplomacy of indigenous peoples or traditional knowledge (also referred to in French by such terms as diplomatie cosmopolitique, diplomatie vitale) (Foyer & Kervran, 2020).…”
Section: Top-down and Bottom-up Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%