2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2020.103791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A parallel-guided compliant mechanism with variable stiffness based on layer jamming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is therefore complicated to design and control the stages using multi-actuators. [15][16][17] For example, the voice coil motor with coarse resolution and piezoelectric actuator with fine resolution are applied to implement the micropositioning stage. Therefore, a single-drive micropositioning stage with multi resolutions can be designed by varying the stiffness of the stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore complicated to design and control the stages using multi-actuators. [15][16][17] For example, the voice coil motor with coarse resolution and piezoelectric actuator with fine resolution are applied to implement the micropositioning stage. Therefore, a single-drive micropositioning stage with multi resolutions can be designed by varying the stiffness of the stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanopositioning systems with tunable stiffness enable adjustment of the working range and mechanical bandwidth according to the operating conditions. Several controllable stiffness solutions, including cross-section shaping [ 17 ], the implementation of multilayer beams [ 18 ], preloading and boundary condition adjustment [ 19 ], layer jamming [ 20 ], and fluid-based approaches [ 21 ], have been applied in the design of compliant mechanisms and nanopositioning systems. However, the essential tuning mechanisms significantly affect the mechanical structure of the nanopositioning systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the realization principle of variable stiffness, wearable robots can be classified into three types: functional material-based [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], vacuum-based [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], and friction-based [28][29][30]. In particular, functional material-based type robots have obvious advantages in terms of volume and weight, and a shape memory alloy (SMA) is the most frequently employed functional material in the variable stiffness structure design [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emergence of a vacuum-based jamming mechanism provides an alternative for achieving variable stiffness in wearable robots [19]. Vacuum-based jamming can be categorized into two types: granular [20,21] and layer jamming [22][23][24][25][26][27]. Choi et al [20] proposed a soft wearable robot for wrist support with a variable stiffness mechanism based on granular jamming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation