1999
DOI: 10.1097/00003226-199911000-00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Noncontact Pneumatic Esthesiometer for Measurement of Ocular Sensitivity

Abstract: We conclude that this pneumatic esthesiometer provides repeatable and reliable measures of ocular-surface sensitivity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accurate measurement of corneal sensitivity can be a reliable test of long-term corneal compromise, and strong correlations exist between sensibility and the number and density of nerves and between numbers of nerves and the number of superficial corneal epithelial cells. 14,15 As the traditional standard method of assessing corneal sensibility, use of the Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer allows data to be compared with Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery • January 2009 previous studies. Also, although newer devices such as the noncontact gas esthesiometer provide greater versatility and repeatability, this traditional testing method remains highly sensitive and cost efficient.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate measurement of corneal sensitivity can be a reliable test of long-term corneal compromise, and strong correlations exist between sensibility and the number and density of nerves and between numbers of nerves and the number of superficial corneal epithelial cells. 14,15 As the traditional standard method of assessing corneal sensibility, use of the Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer allows data to be compared with Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery • January 2009 previous studies. Also, although newer devices such as the noncontact gas esthesiometer provide greater versatility and repeatability, this traditional testing method remains highly sensitive and cost efficient.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disadvantages of the Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer include the invasive nature of the procedure, which may damage corneal epithelium, the anxiety it causes patients when they see thread approaching their eyes, and the numerous technical factors that affect both the device itself and the sensitivity measurements. [6][7][8] More recently, there have been a number of pneumatic esthesiometers used that reduce or eliminate many of the disadvantages of the Cochet-Bonnet device, some with the major additional advantage of selectively stimulating specific neurons on the ocular surface. 7,[9][10][11][12][13] These devices typically blow a jet of air, the temperature of which may be controlled or at room temperature, onto the ocular surface to generate mechanical and thermal stimuli.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8] More recently, there have been a number of pneumatic esthesiometers used that reduce or eliminate many of the disadvantages of the Cochet-Bonnet device, some with the major additional advantage of selectively stimulating specific neurons on the ocular surface. 7,[9][10][11][12][13] These devices typically blow a jet of air, the temperature of which may be controlled or at room temperature, onto the ocular surface to generate mechanical and thermal stimuli. With carbon dioxide added to the air, chemical stimuli may be generated because the CO 2 dissolves in the tears forming a local acidic area.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 It was suggested that delayed tear clearance leads to chronic ocular surface inflammation, which in turn could sensitize the nerves that are responsible for the irritation symptoms. 28 Since corneal sensitivity decreased after contact lens wear, 29 it is possible that contact lens wearers visit a doctor at a later stage than patients with non-specific ocular irritation symptoms. This delay allows the papillae enough time to build up in the conjunctiva.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%