2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-019-03350-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new resilience measure for supply networks with the ripple effect considerations: a Bayesian network approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An important contribution can be seen in detecting disruption scenarios and identifying critical nodes (or combinations of nodes), the failure of which would lead to SC discontinuities and operational collapse ( Zeng and Xiao, 2014 ; Tang et al, 2016 ; Deng et al, 2019 ; Pavlov et al, 2020 ). Another important application area consists of measuring SC robustness and resilience under disruption propagation and structural dynamics ( Han and Shin, 2016 ; Sokolov et al, 2016 ; Hosseini & Ivanov, 2019 ; Li and Zobel, 2020 ). Along with the stress-testing of existing SC designs, the network level analyses suggest directions to enhance the resilience, e.g., through supplier diversification ( Lei et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Theories Major Outcomes and Managerial Insightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An important contribution can be seen in detecting disruption scenarios and identifying critical nodes (or combinations of nodes), the failure of which would lead to SC discontinuities and operational collapse ( Zeng and Xiao, 2014 ; Tang et al, 2016 ; Deng et al, 2019 ; Pavlov et al, 2020 ). Another important application area consists of measuring SC robustness and resilience under disruption propagation and structural dynamics ( Han and Shin, 2016 ; Sokolov et al, 2016 ; Hosseini & Ivanov, 2019 ; Li and Zobel, 2020 ). Along with the stress-testing of existing SC designs, the network level analyses suggest directions to enhance the resilience, e.g., through supplier diversification ( Lei et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Theories Major Outcomes and Managerial Insightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this stage, SCs are experiencing initial misbalances in supply and demand due to longer lead-times, demand drops, and supply unavailability due to facility closures. OR methods can support SC managers at this stage by stress-testing the existing and alternative SC configurations and production-distribution plans for some scenarios of structural dynamics in anticipation of, or as a reaction to, facility and market closure due to quarantines and lockdowns ( Hosseini & Ivanov, 2019 ; Tan et al, 2019 ; Li and Zobel, 2020 ; Sawik, 2020 ). OR methods can also help optimize contingency-preparedness plans for their efficient and timely deployment under different scenarios of epidemic propagation ( Liberatore et al, 2012 , Ghadge et al, 2013 , Ivanov et al, 2015 ; Sinha et al, 2020 ; Pavlov et al, 2019 ; Goldbeck et al, 2020).…”
Section: Directions For Managerial Applications and Future Research Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the temporal nature of the disruption propagation is not considered. Hosseini and Ivanov (2019) further propose a metric, built on the BN approach, for quantifying the resilience of the SC under ripple effect. Incorporating the dynamics of the disruption propagation over a time horizon, Hosseini, Ivanov, and Dolgui (2019b) first propose a dynamic BN (DBN) approach to analyse the disruption propagation in an SC (with two suppliers and one manufacturer) over a time horizon.…”
Section: Sc Disruption Risk Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the BN's results show that the resilience capacity of an inland port is related to the three components of absorptive capacity (a means to withstand a disruptive event, or a reduction in vulnerability), adaptive capacity (a means to temporarily adapt to maintain performance), and restorative capacity (a means to restore performance in a long term manner, which with adaptive capacity constitutes recoverability). So, various pre-disaster and post-disaster strategies can improve the three capacities to varying extents, all combining to improve the resilience capacity of the port [7]; [17].…”
Section: ) Case Study: the Resilience Of An Inland Water Port The Pmentioning
confidence: 99%