2020
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1841318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new robust dynamic Bayesian network approach for disruption risk assessment under the supply chain ripple effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in Industry 4.0 and digital SC systems (Ivanov and The model allows to maximise the SC total profit over multiple periods and to minimise the total travel times for unsatisfied customers, whose demands must be met by retailers to maximise the SC responsiveness (continued). Network design level Impact of the ripple effect on SC resilience and robustness;Sensitivity of different SC designs to the ripple effect;Criticality of some nodes/arcs in the SC for the ripple effect dispersal Lei et al (2020), Dubey et al (2020), Mishra et al (2020), Brintrup, Chauhan, and Perera (2020), Liu et al (2020) Process planning level Proactive policies to mitigate the ripple effect (i.e. inventory and capacity buffers, backup sourcing, product substitution) Ma, He, and Gu (2020), Özçelik, Yılmaz, and Yeni (2020), Azaron, Venkatadri, and Doost (2020), Jahani et al (2020), Gholami-Zanjani et al (2020) Operative control level Reactive policy deployments for ripple effect control and recovery Choi (2020), Lee, Yoon, and Lee (2020) Table 1 provides an overview of the papers included in this special issue, their methodologies and major outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in Industry 4.0 and digital SC systems (Ivanov and The model allows to maximise the SC total profit over multiple periods and to minimise the total travel times for unsatisfied customers, whose demands must be met by retailers to maximise the SC responsiveness (continued). Network design level Impact of the ripple effect on SC resilience and robustness;Sensitivity of different SC designs to the ripple effect;Criticality of some nodes/arcs in the SC for the ripple effect dispersal Lei et al (2020), Dubey et al (2020), Mishra et al (2020), Brintrup, Chauhan, and Perera (2020), Liu et al (2020) Process planning level Proactive policies to mitigate the ripple effect (i.e. inventory and capacity buffers, backup sourcing, product substitution) Ma, He, and Gu (2020), Özçelik, Yılmaz, and Yeni (2020), Azaron, Venkatadri, and Doost (2020), Jahani et al (2020), Gholami-Zanjani et al (2020) Operative control level Reactive policy deployments for ripple effect control and recovery Choi (2020), Lee, Yoon, and Lee (2020) Table 1 provides an overview of the papers included in this special issue, their methodologies and major outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of generating accurate CPTs and DTMCs becomes exhaustive, especially in cases with insufficient sample data. Future iterations of this methodology should consider other processes, such as noisyor modeling or Liu et al's [142] SA algorithm. Finally, the developed metric, E M , only pertains to a specific installation.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the accuracy of CPTs is heavily dependent on expert elicitation or historical data, which may or may not be readily available [140,141]. To cope with the challenges of a scant data environment, Liu et al [142] introduced a robust DBN optimization model for small-size instances and a simulated annealing (SA) algorithm to handle larger-scale problems.…”
Section: Initial Impact Disruption Risk Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shaheen et al (2020) asserts that the ripple effect is characterized by downstream supply chain disruptions, which can affect the performance of the entire supply chain [50]. Moreover, Liu et al (2019) argues that under the ripple effect, the risk of disruption is a challenge that all companies must face [51].…”
Section: A Ripple Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%