2012
DOI: 10.4007/annals.2012.175.3.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new proof of the density Hales-Jewett theorem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2009, inspired in part by his previous work on Szemerédi's theorem, Gowers proposed to locate a purely combinatorial proof of the density Hales-Jewett theorem by a creative new paradigm-an online crowdsourced effort, where dozens of mathematicians, mostly communicating through blogs and wikis, would contribute and debate possible attack strategies. After a very intensive sevenweek effort involving thousands of comments by many mathematicians, such a combinatorial proof was finally obtained in 2010, with the results eventually being published in [Pol12] under the pseudonym "D.H.J. Polymath;" the initials here stand for "Density Hales Jewett."…”
Section: Terence Taomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2009, inspired in part by his previous work on Szemerédi's theorem, Gowers proposed to locate a purely combinatorial proof of the density Hales-Jewett theorem by a creative new paradigm-an online crowdsourced effort, where dozens of mathematicians, mostly communicating through blogs and wikis, would contribute and debate possible attack strategies. After a very intensive sevenweek effort involving thousands of comments by many mathematicians, such a combinatorial proof was finally obtained in 2010, with the results eventually being published in [Pol12] under the pseudonym "D.H.J. Polymath;" the initials here stand for "Density Hales Jewett."…”
Section: Terence Taomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, the best known bound was O(1/ log * n), achieved by appealing to a quantitative version of the density Hales-Jewett theorem [33]. Theorem 1.8 makes progress on a question of Green [23] and on a question of Haszla, Holenstein and Mossel [30].…”
Section: Extremal Combinatoricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas Citizen Science focuses on the fact that contributors are not professional scientists, this aspect is less central in Crowd Science: Although most Crowd Science projects engage with citizen crowds, crowds may also consist of professional scientists and other experts. Examples include Harvard Medical School's effort to crowdsource research problems from within the university community (Guinan, Boudreau, and Lakhani 2013), as well as a series of Polymath projects that require high levels of training in mathematics (Polymath 2012). Discussions of Crowd Science typically start from the vantage point of professional scientists who enlist crowds to advance their research.…”
Section: Crowd Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that crowd members are not socialised in the traditional institution of science and their number is large, there is also a limited role for authorship and peer recognition, although a few CS projects have granted authorship to individual crowd members or have recognised the crowd under a collective pseudonym (e.g. Polymath 2012;Khatib et al 2011;Lintott et al 2009). As such, CS projects appear to rely on a more limited range of motivators: One is crowd members' intrinsic interest in particular topics such as astronomy or ornithology (Sauermann and Franzoni 2013).…”
Section: Provision Of Rewardsmentioning
confidence: 99%