2017
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-17-0460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Naturalistic, Randomized Pilot Trial of E-Cigarettes: Uptake, Exposure, and Behavioral Effects

Abstract: Background Most studies of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) compare self-selected users vs. non-users. The few randomized studies to date generally support a positive impact on reducing smoking behavior, but these studies are focused on guided ENDS use. This study presents a randomized naturalistic trial of ENDS with prospective outcomes of uptake and behavioral changes in smoking. Methods Adult smokers with minimal ENDS history were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive product for 3 weeks (n=46),… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
54
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
4
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This change did not affect adherence (because product use at quit date was very high), but might limit the generalisable of the findings to policy environments where precessation use of NRT is not supported. Finally, serious adverse events were self-reported and similar to those reported in previous e-cigarette [3][4][5][6][7]9 and NRT trials. 16 However, the sample size was not sufficient to assess uncommon serious adverse events, nor was followup long enough to identify serious adverse events with a long lead-time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This change did not affect adherence (because product use at quit date was very high), but might limit the generalisable of the findings to policy environments where precessation use of NRT is not supported. Finally, serious adverse events were self-reported and similar to those reported in previous e-cigarette [3][4][5][6][7]9 and NRT trials. 16 However, the sample size was not sufficient to assess uncommon serious adverse events, nor was followup long enough to identify serious adverse events with a long lead-time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…1 E-cigarettes, mostly with nicotine, are used by smokers in many countries as an aid to quit smoking. 2 To date, seven clinical trials [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] (total N=8222; range n=68 to 6006) have investigated the efficacy and effectiveness of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation and overall suggest a net benefit. However, only four trials (N=7849; n=300 to 6006) had 6-month abstinence as a primary outcome 3,4,8,9 and only two trials (total N=6892) 8,9 tested a second-generation e-cigarette (capable of delivering nicotine more effectively than first-generation devices).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourthly, using the cross‐sectional data, we cannot make any causal inferences on the relationships between prices, use restrictions and behaviors of concurrent use and complete switch. Further, using cross‐sectional data, we cannot explain whether and to what extent concurrent use will ultimately lead to complete switch . Finally, a smaller sample size of the survey data may provide insufficient power to detect price effects on NVP use, concurrent use and complete switch.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Otro estudio más pequeño, realizado en 2017 por Carpenter y colaboradores, en cambio, no logró demostrar que los CE fueran superiores a un grupo control en el logro de abstinencia, ni en el número de intentos de cesar. Nuevamente, sí se evidenció una reducción del número de cigarrillos al día en el grupo que usó CE (34) .…”
Section: Evidencias Relacionadas Con Las Estrategias De Cesaciónunclassified