Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.1995.466818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model of figure-ground segregation from kinetic occlusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally studied in controlled laboratory experiments [4,8,26,42], such motion cues have received comparatively little attention for the purpose of object popout in computer vision, e.g. [3,7,29,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally studied in controlled laboratory experiments [4,8,26,42], such motion cues have received comparatively little attention for the purpose of object popout in computer vision, e.g. [3,7,29,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particle filter approach is employed to deal with the complex, multi-modal distributions in the highdimensional state space. [8] uses local motion information only to infer boundaries and direction-of-figure. In [11], tensor voting yields optical flow estimates together with an uncertainty measure based on the homogeneity of the votes.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occlusion boundaries are assumed to be maxima in the uncertainty measure. Neither [4], [8] nor [11] make use of static cues. Since the optical flow as a secondary feature requires integration over a spatial domain to deal with the aperture problem, edges based only on motion estimates are usually inaccurate and dislocated.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach uses filters tuned to the local spatiotemporal image structure of a motion discontinuity [6,8,11]. These methods model image structure over time rather than the motion field.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…s (x;c) t ; 1) ; I(x t ) ) : (6) Here, is a scale parameter and ( ) is a robust error function applied to the residual error r(x;c) = I(x +ũ s (x;c) t ; 1) ; I(x t ) : (7) For the experiments below, (r ) = r…”
Section: Direct Estimation Of Subspace Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%