2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision 2007
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2007.4408841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to Find Object Boundaries Using Motion Cues

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this has already been realized in related work on e.g. multiview co-segmentation [15] or segmentation with depth or motion cues, which are in many aspects similar to disparity [21,10], light fields also provide an ideal structure for a variational framework which readily allows consistent labeling across all views, and thus increases the accuracy of label assignments dramatically. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this has already been realized in related work on e.g. multiview co-segmentation [15] or segmentation with depth or motion cues, which are in many aspects similar to disparity [21,10], light fields also provide an ideal structure for a variational framework which readily allows consistent labeling across all views, and thus increases the accuracy of label assignments dramatically. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usefulness of annotating at the boundary level has been acknowledged in other vision problems, for instance, Hoeim et al [11] select a subset of contours in the LabelMe dataset [19] to evaluate occlusion boundary detection from a single image; Stein et al [21] released the CMU motion dataset for a similar task, but using a sequence of images. In [6], the annotations of the BSDS are extended to the level of complete objects.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, grouping edge pixels based on mid-level Gestalt cues, e.g. [18,23,12], or recovering occlusion boundaries from a single image [11], or from a sequence [21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regrettably, this has the unintended consequence of making the motion estimate inaccurate at boundaries where occlusions occur. An alternative to this smoothing approach is the use of an implicit model, either learned from local motion cues estimated from training data or based on some fixed model of the distribution of motion cues in the vicinity of occluding boundaries [15][16][17][18]. Though these approaches are appealing because they rely on well-defined statistical models, they remain sensitive to deviations of the actual data from the trained model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%