2010 Design, Automation &Amp; Test in Europe Conference &Amp; Exhibition (DATE 2010) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/date.2010.5457002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A methodology for propagating design tolerances to shape tolerances for use in manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

4
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our method provides better delay accuracy across process window compared to previous efforts [9,10], due to the lithographic variation aware models developed. Compared to previous work on using process-window OPC with timing-aware tolerances [13], our algorithm performs OPC with a single image simulation, thus leading to high runtime savings. Experiments in 45nm SOI technology on polysilicon layouts using high-NA immersion lithography models show that timing accuracy in the presence of lithographic process variations can be improved to within 2%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our method provides better delay accuracy across process window compared to previous efforts [9,10], due to the lithographic variation aware models developed. Compared to previous work on using process-window OPC with timing-aware tolerances [13], our algorithm performs OPC with a single image simulation, thus leading to high runtime savings. Experiments in 45nm SOI technology on polysilicon layouts using high-NA immersion lithography models show that timing accuracy in the presence of lithographic process variations can be improved to within 2%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We also need to ensure that slew propagation does not cause timing infractions. In order to account for this, we constrain the output slew of each cell to be within a certain fraction (η) of its nominal value, similar to the original formulation [13]. As will be shown in stage 2, we penalize any violations of slew degradation higher than this value, thus driving the OPC tool towards a solution with minimum slew violations.…”
Section: Iterations > Max_iterations ?mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations