2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2021.107516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive comparison of Virtual Synchronous Generators with focus on virtual inertia and frequency regulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where δ I is the inverter electric angle, D is the droop gain, p m,I,set is the exogenous power setpoint, p m,I is the filtered power, ω I is the inverter frequency, ω f il is the power measurement cutoff frequency, and p meas,I is the measured, instantaneous power output. This control approach leverages the natural frequency-droop characteristics of inductive networks to distribute power perturbations amongst devices on the network [21]. Conspicuously absent as a control variable in the frequency dynamics of the GFM is ω I .…”
Section: B Frequency Response Of Grid-forming Invertersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where δ I is the inverter electric angle, D is the droop gain, p m,I,set is the exogenous power setpoint, p m,I is the filtered power, ω I is the inverter frequency, ω f il is the power measurement cutoff frequency, and p meas,I is the measured, instantaneous power output. This control approach leverages the natural frequency-droop characteristics of inductive networks to distribute power perturbations amongst devices on the network [21]. Conspicuously absent as a control variable in the frequency dynamics of the GFM is ω I .…”
Section: B Frequency Response Of Grid-forming Invertersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact has been surprisingly seldom addressed [23], [26]. Finally, it is interesting to note that there can be found equivalence between these three, and in particular between VSM and droop-based, approaches [30], [31], [32], [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some adopt fairly simple (first-order transfer functions), while others use high-order synchronous machine models. The former do not represent synchronous machine dynamics fully and later suffer from stability issues [30], [31]. The most important deficiency of these algorithms is that they usually do not implement classical current loops, which means that current limiting, and generally management, is hard to realize, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion, since the synchronverter does not have the physical limitations of a real synchronous generator (SG), its embedded parameters can be adjusted freely and online [26]. Although the synchronverter helps to support inertia in weak grid conditions [27], its main disadvantage is the inability to adjust the dynamic response speed of the active power loop (APL) without affecting the characteristics of the steady-state frequency droop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%