2000
DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2000.918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study on the Rumen Microbial Population of Cattle and Swamp Buffalo Raised under Traditional Village Conditions in the Northeast of Thailand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean rumen pH was similar between both animal species but the buffaloes had a higher liquid outflow rate that could be involved in a lower number of total rumen ciliate protozoa (Dehority, 2003). These data were in agreement with Wanapat et al (2000) who observed lower rumen protozoal populations in swamp buffalo with lower numbers of holotrichs (Isotricha and Dasytricha) and entodiniomorphs compared to those in cattle raised under traditional village conditions in the northeast of Thailand. However, Kumar et al (2002) observed higher concentration of total protozoa in buffalo (9x10 5 /mL) than in cattle rumen (6 x 10 5 /mL) fed an oaten-hay-concentrate.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The mean rumen pH was similar between both animal species but the buffaloes had a higher liquid outflow rate that could be involved in a lower number of total rumen ciliate protozoa (Dehority, 2003). These data were in agreement with Wanapat et al (2000) who observed lower rumen protozoal populations in swamp buffalo with lower numbers of holotrichs (Isotricha and Dasytricha) and entodiniomorphs compared to those in cattle raised under traditional village conditions in the northeast of Thailand. However, Kumar et al (2002) observed higher concentration of total protozoa in buffalo (9x10 5 /mL) than in cattle rumen (6 x 10 5 /mL) fed an oaten-hay-concentrate.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…According to Franzolin & Franzolin (2000), bubaline presented higher concentrations of ruminal fibrolytic and ciliated bacteria of the subfamily Diplodiniinae and Epidinium--classified as large protozoans with cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic activity that were adhered to the solid stages of the digesta. Moreover, according to Wanapat et al (2000) and Franzolin & Franzolin (2000), bubaline presented lower concentration of holotric ciliated protozoan (corresponding to 250 g/kg of the total microbial mass) that ferments soluble carbohydrates and protein and are present in the liquid stage. Considering the in vitro methodology applied, which used only the liquid phase of the rumen with low concentration of microorganism, therefore with low metabolic activity (Czerkawski, 1986), it resulted in an underestimation of IVDDM, specially for buffaloes.…”
Section: Results An Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Host physiology in terms of age (36), genetics (20), and species (55) has been shown to influence rumen microbial consortia. Furthermore, physiological differences in methane output (22) and improved nutrient digestion (41) have been reported to be associated with variation in feed efficiency, thus supporting a role for improved rumen fermentation in increased feed efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%