2021
DOI: 10.1039/d0ta09423d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A branch-like Mo-doped Ni3S2 nanoforest as a high-efficiency and durable catalyst for overall urea electrolysis

Abstract: A branch-like Mo-doped Ni3S2 nanoforest is presented as a robust electrocatalyst for boosted energy-saving H2 production through the overall urea electrolysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differ from OER, UOR occurs preferentially at the anode based on the equation of CO(NH 2 ) 2 + 8 OH − → 6 H 2 O + N 2 + CO 3 2− + 6 e − in the electrolyte containing urea. [ 33 ] Herein, we chose 0.33 M urea as an example based on 1 M KOH solution, and the overpotentials, Tafel slopes, C dl , R ct along with stability toward UOR were systematically assessed for comparation. From Figure a, Fe‐doped NiS–NiS 2 merely requires a driving potential of 1.36 V (versus RHE) to reach 50 mA cm −2 , lower than that of Fe‐doped NiS 2 (1.37 V) and NiS–NiS 2 (1.39 V) and NiS 2 (1.41 V).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differ from OER, UOR occurs preferentially at the anode based on the equation of CO(NH 2 ) 2 + 8 OH − → 6 H 2 O + N 2 + CO 3 2− + 6 e − in the electrolyte containing urea. [ 33 ] Herein, we chose 0.33 M urea as an example based on 1 M KOH solution, and the overpotentials, Tafel slopes, C dl , R ct along with stability toward UOR were systematically assessed for comparation. From Figure a, Fe‐doped NiS–NiS 2 merely requires a driving potential of 1.36 V (versus RHE) to reach 50 mA cm −2 , lower than that of Fe‐doped NiS 2 (1.37 V) and NiS–NiS 2 (1.39 V) and NiS 2 (1.41 V).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, compared to acidic or neutral UOR, alkaline UOR is more promising. For alkaline UOR, owing to the intrinsic higher activities, Ni-based catalysts (Ni-containing metals, 80–84 oxides, 85–90 hydroxides, 91–97 sulfides, 98–102 phosphides, 103–105 selenides, 106–108 nitrides, 109–113 etc. ) have been more widely investigated among all transition metal-based catalysts.…”
Section: Reaction Mechanism Of the Uormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[34,35] Additionally, numerous crystal defects are observed on Ni 3 S 2 shell, which are considered as edge active zones to promote the catalytic performance. [17,18,22,32] The global STEM image in dark field (Figure 1d) evi dently demonstrates the ultrahigh dispersibility of Ni@Ni 3 S 2 nanocrystals, due to which the quantity and density of exposed active sites can be considerably enhanced. HAADFSTEM image of Figure 1e presents the feature of core@shell structure, in which the brighter metal core is sharply observed.…”
Section: Structural Characterization Of Electrocatalystsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…), due to their remarkable electrochemical performance for water splitting and energy storage applications. [16,[21][22][23] Apart from the elemental composition of chemicalbased catalysts, struc tural engineering of optimal geometry have also demonstrated their contribution to further improving the electrocatalytic activity. [24][25][26][27][28] One of the most successful cases is the construc tion of core@shell (or yolk@shell) heterostructures with highly conductive metal cores, which possess outstanding interactions for swift carrier communications with the catalytic shell.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%