2012
DOI: 10.1109/jssc.2012.2185572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 5.6 GHz to 11.5 GHz DCO for Digital Dual Loop CDRs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although similar to what was shown in [3], the large frequency spacing between typical VCO bands to obtain large tuning ranges requires very large R and C values to prevent cycle slipping.…”
Section: Vco Band Switching Circuitsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although similar to what was shown in [3], the large frequency spacing between typical VCO bands to obtain large tuning ranges requires very large R and C values to prevent cycle slipping.…”
Section: Vco Band Switching Circuitsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In [1]- [2], the secondary tuning is implemented using a varactor but requires large capacitors to keep the secondary feedback bandwidth low for stability and to reduce the phase noise. In [3]- [5], the secondary tuning is done with switched arrays of small varactors or capacitors, which allows for digital filtering instead. However, the large number of elements increases parasitic capacitance, and the implementation in [4] requires a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) with a switch matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This CDR is implemented in 0.13μm CMOS and operates from 6.5Mb/s to 11.3Gb/s. Some unique features are a 4-core DCO covering an octave from 5.6-11.5GHz [1], downsampling of data rather than dividing a clock to span the more than 10 octaves of rate, a digital delay-locked loop with clock phase shifter, a FIFO cascaded with a serializer to retime the data on a clean clock, and a data sampler that can oversample the receive eye by a factor of 4 for phase and frequency detection. Additional features beyond the scope of this paper are a user selectable input of either (a) limiting amplifier with 10mV sensitivity and loss-of-signal detector, (b) an adaptive equalizer with up to 12dB of boost at 5.6GHz, or (c) bypass mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [1], [2] and [3], the DLL implements a phase shift on data. For frequencies above the jitter transfer bandwidth of the CDR and below the DLL bandwidth, the phase shifter absorbs most of the jitter on the data to provide an input with reduced jitter to the sampling flip flops in the phase detector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the proposed CDR has the capability to combine with a PLL to decouple jitter transfer and JTOL bandwidths to achieve superior jitter performance [1], [14]. Compared with the architectures in [1] and [14], the proposed PI can be used to adjust the clock phase instead of delaying the data [7], [15]. It is a better solution for high-speed applications, as the data phase shifter that covers a wide range of tunable delay is power-consuming and introduces intersymbol interference distortion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%