2011 Proceedings of the ESSCIRC (ESSCIRC) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/esscirc.2011.6044889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 10 pJ/cycle ultra-low-voltage 32-bit microprocessor system-on-chip

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When idle, ULSNAP's timer coprocessor uses only 300 nW at nominal V DD , as compared to 400 µW for the coprocessor in [6]. We compared ULSNAP against various state-of-the-art microcontrollers [1][2][3][4][5] and present the results in Table II. Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When idle, ULSNAP's timer coprocessor uses only 300 nW at nominal V DD , as compared to 400 µW for the coprocessor in [6]. We compared ULSNAP against various state-of-the-art microcontrollers [1][2][3][4][5] and present the results in Table II. Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the sending process asserts the data 0 line to represent a false token (1), which the receiving process acknowledges (2). The channel then resets (3,4). As can be seen in Fig.…”
Section: Data-driven Qdi Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enhance the SoCs power consumption, the core voltage supply is reduced, reaching in latest technology nodes a minimum voltage value of 0.6V [1]. The reduction is limited by the SRAM voltage scalability, which can remain at higher voltage using a secondary power supply source, however Von Neumann architectures first levels of memories (cache, register file) suffer from the induced higher interconnection delay [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It consumes only 15.6 pJ/Ops at 1.0 V. For the same supply voltage level (1.0 V), yet 130 nm process Kwong et al [15] report 47 pJ/cycle energy consumption for their 16-bit core where the number of clock cycle per instruction is higher than one. In another work, Ickes et al [16] introduce a 32-bit core implemented in 65 nm, and the energy consumption of the core [16] is estimated for 1.0 V between 19.7 pJ/Ops and 27.0 pJ/Ops. Compared to these state-of-theart processing cores, our optimized core consumes less energy per operations notably due to its simplified architecture as well as reduced instruction set, as explained in Section III-A.…”
Section: ) Energy Efficiency Of the Corementioning
confidence: 99%