1995
DOI: 10.1109/4.375971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 0.65-ns, 72-kb ECL-CMOS RAM macro for a 1-Mb SRAM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SRAM macro shown in this paper achieves an access time of 125 ps at a working frequency of 4 GHz with a −3.4 V power supply using IBM 8HP technology, which is shorter compared with the designs using other technologies. The power–delay product is much lower than the power–delay product of 2145 ps W for the design using 0.2 μm BiCMOS presented in paper [23] and 6300 ps W for the design using 0.3 μm BiCMOS presented in paper [39]. Compared with the implementation in [36] using 45 nm CMOS technology with access time of 450 ps, this macro implemented in 8XP achieves much shorter access time (125 ps) with a reasonable power consumption of 0.73 W and a power–delay product of 91 ps W. Compared with the implementation in [37] using 100 nm CMOS, this macro designed in 8XP and 8HP achieves shorter access time with less area consumption.…”
Section: Test and Measured Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The SRAM macro shown in this paper achieves an access time of 125 ps at a working frequency of 4 GHz with a −3.4 V power supply using IBM 8HP technology, which is shorter compared with the designs using other technologies. The power–delay product is much lower than the power–delay product of 2145 ps W for the design using 0.2 μm BiCMOS presented in paper [23] and 6300 ps W for the design using 0.3 μm BiCMOS presented in paper [39]. Compared with the implementation in [36] using 45 nm CMOS technology with access time of 450 ps, this macro implemented in 8XP achieves much shorter access time (125 ps) with a reasonable power consumption of 0.73 W and a power–delay product of 91 ps W. Compared with the implementation in [37] using 100 nm CMOS, this macro designed in 8XP and 8HP achieves shorter access time with less area consumption.…”
Section: Test and Measured Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The area and power density of this macro is smaller than the density of the former 0.2 μm BiCMOS SRAM implementation [23]. Compared with the 130 nm CMOS [38] implementation, the area density of this macro is around 5 times larger, whereas the access time of this macro is 5 times less.…”
Section: Test and Measured Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of solutions, such as BL twisting, have been proposed to reduce cross talk noise and increase the signal-noise ratio (SNR) [Ohhata92,Noda01]. These solutions, however, focus mainly on overcoming BL coupling from a design point of view, in order to prevent data destruction during a write operation [Takeda00], or in order to reduce the BL delay time during the precharge cycle, thereby increasing overall memory performance [Nambu95]. This section evaluates the impact of coupling on the faulty behavior of the SRAM.…”
Section: Effects Of Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on the impact of parasitic capacitance on the faulty behavior has up till now addressed faults in peripheral memory circuits as well as address decoders [14].A number of solutions, such as BL twisting, have been proposed to reduce cross talk noise and increase the signal-to-noise ratio [7], [8]. However, such solutions focus mainly on overcoming BL coupling from a design perspective and are expensive to implement making them infeasible in many applications [9], [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%