2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1013100704794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
80
0
11

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 838 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
80
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…There is, for example, increasing evidence that fi rms combine local and global sources in their product renewal and innovation processes (Asheim and Isaksen, 2002;Simmie, 2003;Moodysson et al, 2008;Trippl, 2011). Extra-regional and global linkages take many forms, such as trade networks.…”
Section: External Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is, for example, increasing evidence that fi rms combine local and global sources in their product renewal and innovation processes (Asheim and Isaksen, 2002;Simmie, 2003;Moodysson et al, 2008;Trippl, 2011). Extra-regional and global linkages take many forms, such as trade networks.…”
Section: External Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Academic research has been increasingly recognized as necessary for the creation and dissemination of knowledge, whether in national innovation systems (Lundvall, 1992) or in local and regional innovation systems (Asheim and Isaksen, 2002). In most scientific papers produced by universities and faculties the researchers make up social networks through interpersonal relationships within their own institutions, as well as through other institutions, in order to improve their learning, to search for more research capabilities, to accelerate the diffusion of knowledge generated by them, and especially to legitimize and get recognition for their personal contributions (Barab, Thomas, and Merrill, 2001;Lee and Bozeman, 2005;Merton, 1973;Moody, 2004;Wagner and Leydesdorff, 2005).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] This unprecedented growth is an outcome of many factors, which have made biopharmaceutical sector a boon for Indian economy. [2] As per the database of Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council (BIRAC) Nearly 760 units are operating in the arena of biotechnology, of which 63% units are engaged in healthcare biotechnology. It has been observed that Indian firms have aggressively increase in the number of linkages, formal or informal, with pharmaceutical MNCs to capitalize on their manufacturing competencies and exploit marketing resources of MNCs for diving in the global economic activities [3] However, the determinants of 'attractiveness' [1] is not uniform across the country; certain 'knowledge hubs' or clusters have emerged due to the institutional arrangements, which may aid to innovation in biopharmaceuticals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State and Central Governments, through policies, have stressed on the importance of clusters (e.g. Biotechnology Policy, 2001; Biotechnology policy 2013), [2] leading to the construction of many state-initiated clusters, in order to erect a robust regional system of innovation for bio pharmaceutics. [4] Notably, there has been a significant increase in the number of bio clusters in different regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%