2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2012.05.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D double sided detector fabrication at IMB-CNM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Columnar 3D pixel sensors [4,5] possess several intrinsic properties making them good candidates to create the layers of Figure 1: Schematic diagram of a planar (left) and a 3D (right) sensor, showing the charge carrier creation when a particle passes through, and the carriers movement before being collected on the electrodes. a tracking system exposed to an extreme radiation environment.…”
Section: Radiation Hardness and 3d Columnar Pixel Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Columnar 3D pixel sensors [4,5] possess several intrinsic properties making them good candidates to create the layers of Figure 1: Schematic diagram of a planar (left) and a 3D (right) sensor, showing the charge carrier creation when a particle passes through, and the carriers movement before being collected on the electrodes. a tracking system exposed to an extreme radiation environment.…”
Section: Radiation Hardness and 3d Columnar Pixel Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detector and fabrication description can be found on ref. [4,5]. Figure 2 shows both single-sided FBK and double-sided IMB-CNM pixel layout sensors.…”
Section: Radiation Hardness and 3d Columnar Pixel Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detectors are fabricated in a similar method as reported in ref. [9] and they will use the mask detailed in ref. [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tight IBL time schedule made evident that the double-sided 3D sensor technologies of FBK [6] and CNM [7] offered a number of advantages, among them reduced process complexity and faster production times compared to the singlesided 3D sensor technology with support wafer originally proposed at SNF (Stanford, USA) [8] and later transferred to SINTEF [9]. Furthermore, with double-sided 3D's the bias can be applied from the sensor back-side, making the front-side layout less demanding and significantly simplifying the sensor assembly within a pixel detector system.…”
Section: Lessons Learned From Existing 3d Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%