2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recycling pyrolyzed organic waste from plant nurseries, rice production and shrimp industry as peat substitute in potting substrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BC and other carbonized materials have also been proposed as peat alternatives due to their capacity to mimic peat properties such as high porosity, structural stability, low bulk density, and high-water retention capacity [5,17]. Nevertheless, these carbon-rich materials do not provide nutrients to the mixture [18] and, therefore, require the addition of fertilizers and compost to sustain plant growth [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BC and other carbonized materials have also been proposed as peat alternatives due to their capacity to mimic peat properties such as high porosity, structural stability, low bulk density, and high-water retention capacity [5,17]. Nevertheless, these carbon-rich materials do not provide nutrients to the mixture [18] and, therefore, require the addition of fertilizers and compost to sustain plant growth [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Bezerra et al (2017) and Tacon (1989), shrimp head silage is a good source of several mineral nutrients, both for fertilization in plants and the manufacture of feed and food. Nocentini et al (2021) stated that chitin residues generated from shrimp parts can be recycled for use in soils lacking in nutrients such as N and P.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, some organic and inorganic wastes have been proposed as substitutes to peat [24,25]. For example, numerous studies have investigated the use of biochar as a plant growing substrate [26][27][28][29]. However, production costs for biochar and other components must be systematically assessed and compared with peat, as recommended by Haeldermans et al [30], who evaluated the techno-economic viability of biochar production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%