2019 IEEE International Solid- State Circuits Conference - (ISSCC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/isscc.2019.8662490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3.3 A 5GS/s 158.6mW 12b Passive-Sampling 8×-Interleaved Hybrid ADC with 9.4 ENOB and 160.5dB FoM<inf>S</inf> in 28nm CMOS

Abstract: Emerging 5G communication systems require ADCs to directly digitize wide bandwidth (BW) signals with high spectral purity at low power consumption. Current state-of-the-art solutions include mainly time-interleaved (TI) pipelined [1-4] or pipelined-SAR [5] architectures, enhanced by digital calibration. To ensure a sufficiently high input BW, all these designs employ a static front-end buffer. This buffer often dissipates more power than the ADC itself, significantly deteriorates the linearity and noise perfor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As another example, for the 12-bit 5-GHz 159-mW ADC in [22] to incur 3 dB of SNR penalty due to clock jitter, we have P V C O ≈ 330 mW. The charge pump noise further raises these power numbers.…”
Section: B Lower Power Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As another example, for the 12-bit 5-GHz 159-mW ADC in [22] to incur 3 dB of SNR penalty due to clock jitter, we have P V C O ≈ 330 mW. The charge pump noise further raises these power numbers.…”
Section: B Lower Power Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quest for higher ADC speeds and resolutions continues [19]- [22]. The sampling clock jitter in ADC design presents daunting challenges.…”
Section: Pll Jitter-power Trade-offs For Adcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section discusses a comprehensive comparison of the performance of CT pipelined ADCs, as outlined in Table 1. The comparison includes CT pipelined ADCs and notable ADCs using other architectures, such as single-loop CT [29], MASH CT [8], and DT interleaved and pipelined SAR ADCs [30]. It can be seen from Table 1 that most of the CT pipelined ADCs have an OSR of 4 or less.…”
Section: F Comparisons Of Ct Pipelined and Other Adcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, consider a comparison with the state-of-theart DT interleaved and pipelined ADC [30], which achieves similar application BW and NSD compared to the CT pipelined ADCs [17] and [20]. The DT ADC [30] achieves a wider BW with a 7 dB or 2 dB better FOM S than [17] and [21], respectively.…”
Section: F Comparisons Of Ct Pipelined and Other Adcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, stage scaling [1], opamp sharing [2,3], and open-loop residue amplifier [4,5] were classical lowpower design approaches. With the advent of a pipelined SAR ADC architecture [6], using a dynamic amplifier (DA) as a residue amplifier has been attracting considerable attentions [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Since the DA does not draw static current, this approach can lead to a fully dynamic and hence very power-efficient implementation given that the successiveapproximation register (SAR) ADC [21][22][23] in the stage typically does not consume static power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%