Construção e validação do conteúdo do questionário dos conhecimentos e competências do treinador - QCCT

Abstract

The validation of this questionnaire is an important tool for analyzing the knowledge and skills of coaches, as well as a better understanding of their practice context. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to establish the content validity of the Coaches’ Knowledge and Competence Questionnaire (CKCQ). Five specialists with doctorate degree for at least 10 years, academic experience and periodicity of publications with the theme in national and international journals participated in the validation process. Specialists evaluated 38 items of the questionnaire and assigned a score on a 1-5 point likert scale for each item in the language clarity, practical pertinence and theoretical relevance criteria. The content validity coefficient (CVC) was used to determine the CVCI of items and the CVCt of the total instrument of each criterion, adopting cutoff point of 0.81. The approximate results found for language clarity (0.92), practical pertinence (0.99) and theoretical relevance (0.98) presented values considered almost perfect and appropriate for validation. The content validation of the CKCQ is an important alternative for the evaluation of the knowledge and competences of sports coaches.

Mixed Method Research on Football Coaches’ Competitive Behavior

“…The panel consisted of six Ph.D. researchers and four youth football coaches, of which the last two were graduates in physical education and sports and two certified masters in sport training. The experts were asked for a qualitative evaluation of the questionnaires and all the comments for improvement were recorded (Quinaud et al, 2018). According to the request, the experts reported that the questions were overall following the variables that are intended to measure the level of expectations and perception (categories of the observational instrument) and suggested some changes for clarifying content, objective, and enabling the introduction of practical examples in the questions.…”

Treinadores(as) em formação universitária: percepções sobre conhecimentos e competências

“…

O objetivo deste estudo de caso foi analisar as percepções de alunos(as) de um curso de Ciências do Esporte no Brasil quanto à importância atribuída e o domínio percebido sobre os conhecimentos e competências do(a) treinador(a) esportivo(a). Utilizamos o questionário de Quinaud et al (2018), com 192 alunos(as) do primeiro ao quinto ano do curso. Fizemos o uso da estatística descritiva e, após constatarmos a distribuição não normal, recorremos ao teste Kruskal-Wallis para a comparação da importância atribuída e do domínio percebido dentro dos grupos.

…”

“…e aim of this case study was to analyze student perception of the attributed importance and perceived mastery of the knowledge and competencies of the sports coach, in a Sport Sciences course in Brazil. e questionnaire by Quinaud et al (2018) was administered to 192 students from the first to the fih year of the program. Descriptive statistics were used and, aer verifying the non-normal distribution, the Kruskal-Wallis test was carried out to compare the attributed importance and perceived mastery within the groups.…”