2015
DOI: 10.1590/s2317-64312015000200001397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

O efeito do feedback auditivo atrasado na gagueira

Abstract: Objetivo Verificar o efeito do feedback auditivo atrasado (delay auditory feedback) e da retroalimentação com a frequência alterada (frequency altered feedback) em indivíduos que manifestam gagueira. Métodos Foram selecionados 16 indivíduos adultos com diagnóstico de gagueira, de ambos os gêneros, faixa etária entre 17 e 49 anos e com, no mínimo, 8 anos de escolaridade. Os indivíduos foram distribuídos em dois grupos, sendo um grupo (G1) formado por oito indivíduos gagos submetidos à terapia de fala com o uso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed positive effects in individuals with stuttering without central auditory processing (SG) alterations, because the following reductions occurred: i) the frequency score of stuttering-like disfluencies of Stuttering Severity Instrument (17) ; (ii) the amount of blocks and monosyllabic words repetitions, and (iii) the total of disfluencies of duration. These data corroborate studies which show a decrease of the disfluencies in individuals who stutter under delayed listening condition (11)(12)(18)(19)(20)(21) . This increase in fluency represents a very relevant result for individuals with stuttering, for two main reasons: i) speech is the main form of human communication and its efficiency in transferring information depends on fluency (22) , and ii) the percentage of stuttered syllables or stuttering-like disfluencies is considered a counting measure of stuttering gold standard obtained by the speech language therapist (23) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results showed positive effects in individuals with stuttering without central auditory processing (SG) alterations, because the following reductions occurred: i) the frequency score of stuttering-like disfluencies of Stuttering Severity Instrument (17) ; (ii) the amount of blocks and monosyllabic words repetitions, and (iii) the total of disfluencies of duration. These data corroborate studies which show a decrease of the disfluencies in individuals who stutter under delayed listening condition (11)(12)(18)(19)(20)(21) . This increase in fluency represents a very relevant result for individuals with stuttering, for two main reasons: i) speech is the main form of human communication and its efficiency in transferring information depends on fluency (22) , and ii) the percentage of stuttered syllables or stuttering-like disfluencies is considered a counting measure of stuttering gold standard obtained by the speech language therapist (23) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, despite the decline of SLD and TD in the moderate stuttering group, participants showed a tendency to decrease speech rate, considering that this is not a desirable effect. This result reinforces the previously idea observed in other studies, stating that auditory strategies should not be used in absolute way for all individuals who stutter, because not everyone is benefited, requiring, therefore, individualized tests 15,17,19,20,23 .…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The first study used the delayed auditory feedback for people who stutter and found that the immediate effect of DAF has improved the fluency of the participants without affecting speech naturalness 18 . The other study compared the results in fluency of two groups of stutterers -one submitted only to speech therapy and another which received, associated with the therapy, the delay in auditory feedback -and found that the group which used the delay showed greater reduction of speech disruptions and higher gain in speech rate and production of information, compared to the group that did not use this device 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Auditory Feedback Alteration (AFA) is the collective term for the conditions which involve the electronic alteration of the speech signal, in which the speakers perceive their speech differently from the usual one (16) . Delay and frequency alteration of auditory feedback are the most common alterations in the population of disfluent people (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24) . According to a study, these alterations cause the "choral speech phenomenon".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%