2017
DOI: 10.1590/s1984-29612017068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The first study of molecular prevalence and species characterization of Cryptosporidium in free-range chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) from Brazil

Abstract: Rearing free-range chicken is based on grazing feeding patterns, and these animals could be potential environmental contaminants of Cryptosporidium oocysts for humans and other animals. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the molecular prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in free-range chickens from Brazil. A total of 351 fecal samples from chickens were examined from 20 farms. For detection of Cryptosporidium spp., 18S rRNA gene fragments were amplified using a nested PCR reaction. Positive samples w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, this is the rst report of the presence and prevalence of Cryptosporidium in intensively farmed chickens in Guangdong Province, although previous studies have reported in Hubei, Zhejiang, Henan and Anhui in China [4,9,18,19]. In our study, the overvall prevalence of Cryptosporidium in chickens (13.2%; 132/1001) was comparable to previous values reported for domestic chickens in Brazil (12.6%; 24/190) [20], China (10.2%) [9], Syria (9.9%) [21], higher than Iran (0.5%) [22], Tunisia (4.5%) [23], Jordan (4.8%) [24], and Germany (5.7%) [13], but lower than Brazil (25.6%) [25] and Algeria (34.4%) [5]. Differences in hygiene, management practices, sample origin and detection methods may contribute to these differences in prevalence of Cryptosporidium in poultry ocks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…To our knowledge, this is the rst report of the presence and prevalence of Cryptosporidium in intensively farmed chickens in Guangdong Province, although previous studies have reported in Hubei, Zhejiang, Henan and Anhui in China [4,9,18,19]. In our study, the overvall prevalence of Cryptosporidium in chickens (13.2%; 132/1001) was comparable to previous values reported for domestic chickens in Brazil (12.6%; 24/190) [20], China (10.2%) [9], Syria (9.9%) [21], higher than Iran (0.5%) [22], Tunisia (4.5%) [23], Jordan (4.8%) [24], and Germany (5.7%) [13], but lower than Brazil (25.6%) [25] and Algeria (34.4%) [5]. Differences in hygiene, management practices, sample origin and detection methods may contribute to these differences in prevalence of Cryptosporidium in poultry ocks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…observed in the River Thames in the south of England. In this study, the type of fertilizers used on the positive properties were 50.0% (3/6) chicken litter, 16.7% (1/6) bovine manure and 33.3% (2/6) mixed manure (chicken and bovine), the type of fertilizer had no statistical association with positivity by Cryptosporidium spp., however the parasite was previously described in these animals (AL MAWLY et al, 2015;EWALD et al, 2017;HELMY et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…To our knowledge, this is the first report on the presence and prevalence of Cryptosporidium in intensively farmed chickens in Guangdong Province, although previous studies have been reported in Hubei, Zhejiang, Henan and Anhui in China [ 3 , 5 , 8 , 25 ]. In our study, the overall prevalence of Cryptosporidium in chickens (13.2%; 132/1001) was comparable to previous numbers reported for domestic chickens in Brazil (12.6%) [ 10 ], China (10.2%) [ 8 ] and Syria (9.9%) [ 26 ], and higher than Iran (0.5%) [ 27 ], Tunisia (4.5%) [ 28 ], Jordan (4.8%) [ 29 ] and Germany (5.7%) [ 15 ], but lower than Brazil (25.6%) [ 30 ] and Algeria (34.4%) [ 4 ]. Differences in hygiene, management practices, sample origin and detection methods may contribute to these differences in the prevalence of Cryptosporidium in poultry flocks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%