2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1982-21702010000400005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Análise do termo de primeira ordem das séries de Molodenskii para o problema de valor de contorno da geodésia

Abstract: RESUMONeste trabalho, avaliou-se o termo de primeira ordem das séries de Molodenskii usando as seguintes abordagens: a solução dada pela série de Molodenskii; a solução pelo gradiente vertical; e a solução pela correção de terreno como aproximação do termo 1 G . As duas últimas soluções foram obtidas por Moritz. As duas primeiras soluções mostraram-se coerentes entre si nas condições aqui analisadas. A comparação foi feita em termos de anomalia de altitude de primeira ordem 1  . Em termos do quase geoide fina… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the quasigeoid computation, based on the Molodensky formulation (Molodensky, Yeremeyev, and Yurkina 1962) for a solution of an oblique problem, the height anomaly ()  at a point P is (Forsberg 1984), the 1 g term becomes insignificant. On the other hand, in the theory view for an accurate geoid, it is necessary a rigorous formulation because the terrain corrections are closer to the zeroth-order approximation (Ferreira and De Freitas 2010). In the BVRF 2018 context and for a 5' geoid resolution, it was considered acceptable.…”
Section: Boletim Dementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the quasigeoid computation, based on the Molodensky formulation (Molodensky, Yeremeyev, and Yurkina 1962) for a solution of an oblique problem, the height anomaly ()  at a point P is (Forsberg 1984), the 1 g term becomes insignificant. On the other hand, in the theory view for an accurate geoid, it is necessary a rigorous formulation because the terrain corrections are closer to the zeroth-order approximation (Ferreira and De Freitas 2010). In the BVRF 2018 context and for a 5' geoid resolution, it was considered acceptable.…”
Section: Boletim Dementioning
confidence: 99%