Sinais e sintomas da disfunção temporomandibular nas diferentes regiões brasileiras

Oliveira, Anamaria Siriani de; Bevilaqua-Grossi, Débora; Dias, Elton Matias

doi:10.1590/s1809-29502008000400013

Cited by 10 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The high prevalence of signs and symptoms of TMD (71.9%) confirms the results by Oliveira et al 17 conducted with college students in Brazil, where the prevalence of TMD was 68.6%. However, there are studies showing that TMD was less common among college students, as the study by Minghelli et al, 18 who evaluated university students in the health area, finding TMD in only 37.3%.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

Temporomandibular Dysfunction, Stress and Common Mental Disorder in University Students

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD) and its association with perceived stress and common mental disorder (CMD) in academic students.Methods: This is s transversal observational study conducted at Universidade de Minas Gerais, Divinópolis Unit, in health science courses. To investigate the prevalence of TMD, the anamnestic index by Fonseca was used. Stress was assessed by the perceived stress scale, translated and adapted for the Brazilian population in 2006. To track CMD, we used the Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20). Data were analyzed using SPSS version 13.0, adopting a 5% significance level.Results: The prevalence of TMD in the sample was 71.9%, distributed as follows: Light TMD (50.0%), moderate (16.4%) and severe (5.5%), being more frequent among women (76.4%). Common mental disorders were present in 29.9% of participants. The average perceived stress was 30.9.Conclusion: The results of this study allow us to conclude that there is a statistically significant correlation between TMD and variables such as parafunctional habits, perceived stress and CMD. Level of Evidence II, Development of diagnostic criteria on consecutive patients (with universally applied reference "gold" standard).

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

Temporomandibular Dysfunction, Stress and Common Mental Disorder in University Students

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It was also noted that the female was more rated with TMD, a finding that agrees with the literature, which is probably related to differences between genders such as muscle structure, higher level of anxiety, hormonal changes and increased sensitivity to noxious stimuli. (17,18,(20)(21)(22)(23)(24) The study showed significant differences when comparing the PTT of the masticatory muscles (MS and TM) and UT and showed no significant difference in the SCM muscle of myogenic subgroups with the subgroup WITHOUT TMD. Regarding the masticatory muscles, Farella et al (15) and Moreno et al (25) also found lower PPT in subjects with TMD.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

“…Similar results were also found in other studies with university students, a group that shows risk, possibly by the performance charging level in academic stage. (17)(18)(19)(20) However, these do not use RDC/TMD as a diagnostic tool.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pain threshold in the masticatory and cervical muscles in different types of temporomandibular disorders

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Given the intimate connection of the temporomandibular joint in the cervical region and its functions of chewing, speech and swallowing, patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) have most painful condition in stomathognatic muscles. Objective: Check for differences in pressure pain threshold of the masseter (MS), temporalis (TM), upper trapezius (UT) and sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscles in different types of TMD. Method: Participated in the research 97 subjects, classified according to “The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD)”: myofascial pain (TMD IA), myofascial pain with limited opening (TMD IB), disc displacement with reduction (TMD IIA), disc displacement without reduction and with limited opening (TMD IIB), disc displacement without reduction and without limited opening (TMD IIC). For measurement of the pressure pain threshold (PPT) was used the pressure algometry program (Kratos®) of the TM, MS, UT and SCM muscles. For statistical analysis was used the Graphpad Instat program with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: The sample consisted of 67 women and 30 men with an average age of 22.09 ± 5.45 years. Of these subjects, 40 were classified as “with TMD”, 57 as “without TMD", 34 as “TMD IA”, 16 as “TMD IB”, 14 as “TMD IIA” and nobody as “TMD IIB” and “TMD IIC”. The MS, TM and UT muscles showed decreased threshold in myogenic groups of TMD with relation to the group without TMD. Only the masseter muscle showed statistical significance when compared to the myogenic groups with each other, demonstrating that the IB group has lower PPT. Individuals with TMD IB showed lower PPT of MS, TM and UT muscles when compared to TMD IIA. Conclusion: There is a significant difference comparing the PTT of MS, TM and UT muscles of myofascial pain subgroup to the subgroup without TMD. There were differences between the groups myogenic in PPT of MS. TMD IB showed lower threshold in TMD IB group than in TMD IIA group. Controversially, it was not observed when comparing the SCM muscle and disc displacement subgroup with the subgroup without TMD.

show abstract

“…Os dados coletados na anamnese mostraram relato de dor que variava quanto sua intensidade, ao exame físico, desde desconforto até o extremo, observada com reação de fuga à palpação dos PGs, associada a outros achados clínicos vestibulococleares. Estes dados corroboram com a informação de que a dor é o sintoma mais significativo em DTMs e molesta quase 20% da população ocidental [22][23][24] .…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Tratamento de paciente com disfunção miofascial craniocervicomandibular ascendente associada à alteração vestibulococlear: relato de caso

Ribeiro¹,

Cabral²

2020

Arch Health Invest

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dor e disfunção da articulação temporomandibular (DTM) são comuns e resultam de uma ampla variedade de agentes etiológicos, tanto traumáticos quanto não-traumáticos. O conjunto de sinais e sintomas (dor, alteração da função, ruídos articulares) é denominada disfunção temporomandibular (DTM) e, quando abrange também problemas clínicos na região cervical, utiliza-se o termo disfunção craniocervicomandibular (DCCM). Esta condição pode concorrer para as alterações coclear e vestibular, onde a primeira é justificada pela origem embrionária e proximidade anatômica da ATM com a orelha e a segunda, pela disfunção dos músculos da mastigação e cervical (Masseter e Esternocleidomastóideo) que, por serem antigravitacionais, concorrem para a vestibulopatia, e também, otalgias reflexas. Apesar dessas relações existirem sua patogênese não está totalmente esclarecida. Este trabalho tem como objetivo apresentar um caso clínico de diagnóstico e tratamento de paciente com DCCM associado à alteração vestibulococlear.

show abstract

Sinais e sintomas da disfunção temporomandibular nas diferentes regiões brasileiras

Cited by 10 publications

References 10 publications

Temporomandibular Dysfunction, Stress and Common Mental Disorder in University Students

Temporomandibular Dysfunction, Stress and Common Mental Disorder in University Students

Pain threshold in the masticatory and cervical muscles in different types of temporomandibular disorders

Tratamento de paciente com disfunção miofascial craniocervicomandibular ascendente associada à alteração vestibulococlear: relato de caso

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About