2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1807-59322011000400030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory training and cognitive functioning in adult with traumatic brain injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
13
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The heterogeneity of TBI presents a significant problem for all fields of research and clinical practice, and the results of this study are in line with the idea that individuals with mTBI cannot be treated as a homogenous clinical population. Although further research is needed to better understand the relationship between auditory processing and overall mTBI outcomes, it has been shown in other populations that both subcortical and cortical processing can be affected by remediation including auditory training (Tremblay, K. et al 2001; Tremblay, K. L. & Kraus 2002; Hayes et al 2003; Russo, N. M. et al 2005; Murphy et al 2011). As axonal damage in mTBI is typically not visible on conventional imaging it is possible that both behavioral and objective audiological assessment may also help identify more subtle pathology in both acute and chronic post-injury stages as part of a multi-disciplinary team approach.…”
Section: Conclusion and Clinical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heterogeneity of TBI presents a significant problem for all fields of research and clinical practice, and the results of this study are in line with the idea that individuals with mTBI cannot be treated as a homogenous clinical population. Although further research is needed to better understand the relationship between auditory processing and overall mTBI outcomes, it has been shown in other populations that both subcortical and cortical processing can be affected by remediation including auditory training (Tremblay, K. et al 2001; Tremblay, K. L. & Kraus 2002; Hayes et al 2003; Russo, N. M. et al 2005; Murphy et al 2011). As axonal damage in mTBI is typically not visible on conventional imaging it is possible that both behavioral and objective audiological assessment may also help identify more subtle pathology in both acute and chronic post-injury stages as part of a multi-disciplinary team approach.…”
Section: Conclusion and Clinical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Além disso, esta habilidade também foi estimulada durante o treinamento auditivo, o que nos levaria a pensar que, desta forma, tanto os aspectos auditivos quanto cognitivos seriam infl uenciados positivamente no pós-treino. Murphy et al (2011), por exemplo, demonstraram que, após o treinamento auditivo, aplicado em indivíduo com traumatismo crânio-encefálico, houve melhora signifi cante em cinco das seis habilidades auditivas avaliadas e em cinco das sete habilidades cognitivas, demonstrando a presença de generalização do aprendizado sensorial para as habilidades cognitivas. Os autores concluíram, portanto, que mesmo a partir de um treinamento unimodal, que teve como objetivo melhorar a percepção dos sinais acústicos,foi possível observar uma infl uência positiva em habilidades consideradas "top-down", envolvendo tarefas multimodais.…”
Section: Correlações Antes E Após O Treino Entre Os Aspectos Auditiunclassified
“…After ACAT, it could be observed an improvement in the behavioral auditory processing evaluation, with an improvement or even adjustment in auditory abilities (Tables 1 to 4), which are commonly altered in individuals after TBI, as shown in some studies that performed auditory processing evaluation In this population [12][13][14] . The data found in the DCVT Test -Free Recall (Tables 2) demonstrated that the individual presented a greater number of right ear hits in the two moments after ACAT, that is, he showed an right ear advantage that he did not initially demonstrated, which is often associated to left hemispheric dominance for linguistic sounds in right-handed individuals 15 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%