2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1806-37132011000100007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sintomas respiratórios como indicadores de estado de saúde em trabalhadores de indústrias de cerâmicas

Abstract: Objective: To assess the prevalence of respiratory symptoms and their association with sociodemographic variables and with the characteristics of the work environment. Methods: A cross-sectional study comprising 464 workers employed at ceramics manufacturing facilities located in the city of Várzea Grande, Brazil. Data were collected by means of a questionnaire comprising questions regarding sociodemographic variables, work environment characteristics, and respiratory symptoms. Data were analyzed by means of p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
3
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The respiratory symptom results found for the workers classified as symptomatic (22.4%) on the basis of the respiratory changes (cough, phlegm, wheezing, and dyspnea) in the present study do not corroborate the findings of a study in which a similar respiratory symptom questionnaire was used and 78% of the workers interviewed were found to have respiratory symptoms, 35% of whom had severe respiratory symptoms 13 . The difference between the findings may be due to the different mining activities the workers were engaged in and the mineral dust types they were exposed to, since silica is more aggressive than pyrochlore.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The respiratory symptom results found for the workers classified as symptomatic (22.4%) on the basis of the respiratory changes (cough, phlegm, wheezing, and dyspnea) in the present study do not corroborate the findings of a study in which a similar respiratory symptom questionnaire was used and 78% of the workers interviewed were found to have respiratory symptoms, 35% of whom had severe respiratory symptoms 13 . The difference between the findings may be due to the different mining activities the workers were engaged in and the mineral dust types they were exposed to, since silica is more aggressive than pyrochlore.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Respiratory symptoms, occupational exposure factors, and smoking status were assessed using the British Medical Research Council questionnaire (MRCQ). This questionnaire addressing respiratory symptoms and occupational exposure to inhaled pollutants is used by the Jorge Duprat Figueiredo Foundation for Occupational Safety and Medicine, located in the city of São Paulo, Brazil 13 . The MRCQ comprises questions on respiratory symptoms (cough, phlegm, wheezing, and dyspnea), history of illness in the past 2 years, and smoking history, as well as a checklist for previous illness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is known that quitting smoking is the only factor that can slow the progression of this disease, there is no evidence that there exists a reversion for the pulmonary impairment that has already began. Approximately 90% of COPD cases are related to smoking, whereas other less common risk factors include occupational exposure and biomass burning (26),(27),(28). The historical finding of a lower prevalence of COPD in the female population is associated with a lower proportion of smokers in this group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies analyzing the prevalence of respiratory symptoms and its association with occupational exposure have also reported the presence of upper and lower airway diseases. (8,9) The present study demonstrates that, in addition to periodic measurements of air quality, increased efforts should be made to improve collective protection measures and to raise worker awareness regarding the proper use of personal protective equipment, in order to reduce the risks of exposure to dust. We cannot rule out the possibility that the symptoms reported in our study were related to inappropriate use of personal protective equipment, because that was not a focus of our analysis.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 84%