Responsabilidade social corporativa: limites e possibilidades

Schroeder, Jocimari Tres; Schroeder, Ivanir

doi:10.1590/s1676-56482004000100002

Cited by 23 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Among the main drivers of corporate activism to Social Responsibility are: a) «social problems», which become barriers to the modernization of production systems in achieving higher standards of competitiveness; b) the current social context requires organizations to maintain a balanced relationship with stakeholders by fostering requirements such as transparency; c) intentionally or not, people and organizations are granting more public at-tention to the social actions they perform (Fischer, 2006). We add to this the crisis of confidence in the ability of the state to maintain basic needs for its citizens (Schoeder and Schoeder, 2004).…”

Section: Social Responsibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

El principio de "Interés por la comunidad": más allá de la "responsabilidad social" de las cooperativas

Cançado

Souza

Rigo

et al. 2014

BAIDC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary: I. Introduction. II. The principle of concern for community. III. Social responsibility. IV. The paradigm of the gift -the obligation to give, receive and reciprocate. V. Inconsistent relationship between the principle of concern for community and social responsibility. VI. Coherent relation between the principle of concern for community and theory of gift. VII. Concluding remarks. VIII. Bibliography. Abstract:This article aims to demonstrate the principle of cooperatives Concern for Community represents the way cooperatives interact to its community, especially in a social aspect. Thus there is no need of using the terminology «Social Responsibility for Cooperatives» once the cooperative principle already encompasses the social actions of the cooperative in a more complete and organic way. This discussion is related to traditional mimicry of cooperatives management (technics and tools) from management of companies, which weakens the identity of cooperatives. This text also demonstrates the Theory of Giving can support the theory and practice of the Concern for Community principle.Key-words: concern for community, social responsibility, theory of giving, cooperative.Resumen: El objetivo del artículo es demostrar que el principio cooperativista de «Preocupación por la Comunidad» representa la manera por la cual las cooperativas interactúan con su territorio y la sociedad, especialmente en lo que se refiere a los aspectos sociales de su gestión. Por lo tanto, el concepto de «Responsabilidad Social de las Cooperativas» no es aplicable en la justifi- cación de sus objetivos de gestión. Porque el principio de la cooperación incluye, de forma integral y orgánica el concepto de responsabilidad social. La discusión es parte del tradicional mimetismo discursivo de la administración de empresas con fines de lucro (herramientas y técnicas de gestión) que intentan imponer a los modelos de gestión de cooperativas, lo que trae como consecuencia el debilitamiento de la identidad de las cooperativas. Se propone en este artículo un análisis crítico de la Teoría de la Dadiva con el fin de sustentar la teoría y la práctica del principio de la Preocupación por la Comunidad en el cooperativismo. Palabras claves: Preocupación por la Comunidad, Responsabilidad Social, Teoría de la Dadiva, Cooperativismo.

show abstract

Section: Social Responsibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

El principio de "Interés por la comunidad": más allá de la "responsabilidad social" de las cooperativas

Cançado

Souza

Rigo

et al. 2014

BAIDC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, Pesqueux (2005) complains that its utopian nature, which used to adopt a critical stance with regard to practice, has now allowed it to play a more ideological, legitimizing role. Paula Soares (2004) shows the unstated contradictory aspects of some of its projects, while Schroeder and Schroeder (2004) reveal that CSR is employing hidden strategies to gain more power. However, what is still lacking are alternative or post-colonial voices that can provide a first-hand description of how CSR is experienced and help to shape a very particular kind of subject.…”

Section: Csr and Digital Solidaritymentioning

confidence: 99%

Gifted: the monolingualism of corporate social responsibility

Moriceau

Guérillot

2012

Rev. adm. empres.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Acts of Corporate Social Responsibility are more often than not portrayed as success-story narratives. A quasi-ethnographic study in Senegal shatters the underlying assumptions of these accounts. First a computer donation from a Northern country is described with all the usual incidents and related vocabulary. Later, during a visit to a Senegalese rubbish dump, the story starts to falter, as countless questions arise about what is actually going on there, and how we can know and represent it (both as a portrayal and as a voice). A tipping point in an interview serves to reveal the ambiguities of the position adopted and the difficulties of expressing oneself in a different language. The CSR language is described as a kind of monolingualism, which employs a particular vocabulary and grammar for what is said or thought. This is the monolingualism of the other. Some of the implications of this monolingualism are examined, and this leads to the conclusion that there is a need to take measures with regard to the CSR language and that more than one language is needed to speak about CSR.

show abstract

“…E por fim realça-se a discussão e as considerações finais, com as limitações e sugestões para futuras pesquisas. Realça-se aqui a interdisciplinaridade do tema Governança Corporativa com outras temáticas (RIBEIRO et al, 2012a) 2008), estimulando assim a responsabilidade social corporativa (SCHROEDER; SCHROEDER, 2004;NUNES et al, 2010).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

PRODUÇÃO ACADÊMICA DOS TEMAS GOVERNANÇA CORPORATIVA E SUSTENTABILIDADE: UMA ANÁLISE DOS ÚLTIMOS 14 ANOS NOS PERIÓDICOS INTERNACIONAIS DOI – 10.5752/P.1984-6606.2014v14n35p5

Ribeiro

2014

E&G

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este artigo mapeou o perfil e a produção acadêmica dos temas Governança Corporativa e Sustentabilidade em conjunto, durante o período de 2000 a 2013, nos periódicos internacionais nas áreas de Administração, Contabilidade, Economia, Finanças e Turismo. Metodologicamente, utilizaram-se as técnicas de análise bibliométrica, como também a estatística descritiva nos 58 artigos identificados. Realça-se também que a análise de redes foi trabalhada também enfatizando os atributos de densidade e centralidade. Os principais resultados foram: aproximadamente 69% das publicações foram realizadas em parceria; Anwar, Cvelbar, Galbreath, Lazonick e Mulyadi foram os autores mais profícuos; as Universidades de Curtin e Cambridge foram as que mais publicaram; os países que se destacaram neste estudo foram Austrália, EUA e Inglaterra. Observou-se baixa densidade das redes sociais analisadas neste estudo. E os temas mais abordados foram a responsabilidade social corporativa, disclosure, valor aos acionistas, desempenho organizacional, conselho de administração, desenvolvimento sustentável, ética, auditoria e estrutura de capital.

show abstract

Responsabilidade social corporativa: limites e possibilidades

Cited by 23 publications

References 1 publication

El principio de "Interés por la comunidad": más allá de la "responsabilidad social" de las cooperativas

El principio de "Interés por la comunidad": más allá de la "responsabilidad social" de las cooperativas

Gifted: the monolingualism of corporate social responsibility

PRODUÇÃO ACADÊMICA DOS TEMAS GOVERNANÇA CORPORATIVA E SUSTENTABILIDADE: UMA ANÁLISE DOS ÚLTIMOS 14 ANOS NOS PERIÓDICOS INTERNACIONAIS DOI – 10.5752/P.1984-6606.2014v14n35p5

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About