Posicionamento oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte: atividade física e saúde na mulher

Lazzoli, José Kawazoe; Aurélio, Marcos; Craxı̀, Antonio; Nóbrega, Lucas da; Silveira, Geraldo Gomes da; Fernandes, Eney Oliveira; Leite, Neiva; Ayub, Alice Volpe; Drummond, Félix Albuquerque; Magni, João Ricardo Turra; Macedo, Clayton Luiz Dornelles; Rose, Eduardo Henrique De

doi:10.1590/s1517-86922000000600001

Cited by 62 publications

(58 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…They were recruited in a Pilates studio in São Paulo and in the community of the Universidade Cidade de São Paulo. All participants must have presented readiness to physical activity 21 . Exclusion criteria were uncontrolled metabolic diseases, osteoporosis; inflammatory, rheumatic and neurological disorders; presence of fractures; previous surgeries of musculoskeletal origin and pregnancy.…”

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparação da satisfação, motivação, flexibilidade e dor muscular tardia entre método Pilates moderno e método Pilates instável

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

| The aim of our study was to compare the satisfaction and motivation for the practice of exercise, flexibility and delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) in healthy participants after exercises in two types of the Pilates method. For this, 50 healthy participants performed a session of exercises of modern Pilates and other of unstable Pilates. We evaluated the outcomes for satisfaction and motivation after sessions, posterior flexibility of the torso and lower extremities (sit-and-reach box) before and after each session, and DOMS 24, 48 and 72 hours after each session (Numeric Pain Rating Scale). Results showed no statistically significant difference between both types of Pilates for satisfaction and motivation, flexibility and DOMS 72 hours after the session (p>0.05).Regarding the DOMS we observed statistically significant difference between the two types 24 hours (difference between the means: -0.7; 95%CI: -1.5 to 0.0) and 48 hours (difference between means: -0.8; 95%CI: -1.4 to -0.2) after the session, with greater pain in unstable Pilates. As a conclusion, both categories of Pilates showed the same level of satisfaction and motivation and similar flexibility gain. However, unstablePilates caused more DOMS after 24 and 48 hours, but this difference was not clinically relevant.

show abstract

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparação da satisfação, motivação, flexibilidade e dor muscular tardia entre método Pilates moderno e método Pilates instável

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While some studies show that alterations in estrogen/ progesterone serum concentrations are not sufficient to affect physical performance (17,18) , other experiments demonstrate better performance in some phases of the MC (12,13) . The findings of the present study could not observe differences in muscle strength during 10RM tests performance in the different phases of the MC.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efeito das diferentes fases do ciclo menstrual no desempenho da força muscular em 10RM

Loureiro

Dias

Sales

et al. 2011

Rev Bras Med Esporte

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the different phases of the menstrual cycle (MC) on muscular strength performance in resistance exercises. Nine healthy and physically active women, aged 27±7 yrs, body mass 58.2±5 kg, height 161.1±4.7 cm and BMI 20.4±2 kg/m2 participated in the study. All of them had regular MCs (28-31 days), used oral contraceptives and had been experienced in resistance exercises for at least eight months. Muscle strength was evaluated with a 10RM test in the following order: leg press 45º, bench press, leg extension and biceps curl. The tests were performed in the three phases of the MC: follicular (between the 3rd and 5th day of menses), ovulatory (between 9th and 10th days) and luteal (between 17th and 21th days). ANOVA for repeated measures was applied for statistical analysis, data were analyzed in the SPSS 15.0 and level of significance was set at 5% (p<0.05). No significant statistical differences were observed in the mobilized weight between the MC periods in those four exercises. Regarding the leg press exercise, a 5% increment in muscle strength was observed on the luteal phase. In the remaining exercises and phases these differences were not observed. In conclusion, the phases of the MC did not affect performance of muscular strength in resistance exercise, both single and multiple joint, for large or small muscle groups or in different body segments.

show abstract

“…Many authors recommend that pregnant women remain exercising at the same effort intensity from before pregnancy [4][5][6] . However, this statement is questioned by some authors who state that during pregnancy many physiological variables are altered and this fact may alter their perceived exertion to exercise [7][8][9] .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparação do índice de esforço percebido e consumo de oxigênio em exercício em cicloergômetro entre gestantes e não-gestantes e entre o exercício aquático e terrestre

Finkelstein

Kanitz

Bgeginski

et al. 2012

Rev Bras Med Esporte

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the present study was to assess the differences in ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and oxygen uptake (VO 2 ) behavior during water and land-based exercise, performed in the exercise intensity of the first ventilatory threshold between pregnant and non-pregnant women. Seven pregnant (gestational ages between the 27th and 30th week) and seven non-pregnant women performed two continuous cycle ergometer tests (water and land-based) at the first ventilatory threshold intensity. During all sessions, respiratory gases were collected with a portable AEROSPORT KB1-C mixing box gas analyzer. A pneumotach was used with a neoprene mask. Heart rate (HR) measurements were obtained with a POLAR F1. Data were collected every 20s. RPE on Borg scale from 6 to 20 was derived at the end of the exercise. One-way ANOVA was applied for repeated measures using the post-hoc Bonferroni test (p<0.05). No significant differences were found in VO 2 or RPE when comparing water with land-based exercise. In the same way, no significant difference was found between pregnant and non-pregnant subjects. We suggest that RPE can be used for water and land-based exercise prescription on cycle ergometer at the intensity of first ventilatory threshold, for both pregnant and non-pregnant women.

show abstract

Posicionamento oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte: atividade física e saúde na mulher

Cited by 62 publications

References 24 publications

Comparação da satisfação, motivação, flexibilidade e dor muscular tardia entre método Pilates moderno e método Pilates instável

Comparação da satisfação, motivação, flexibilidade e dor muscular tardia entre método Pilates moderno e método Pilates instável

Efeito das diferentes fases do ciclo menstrual no desempenho da força muscular em 10RM

Comparação do índice de esforço percebido e consumo de oxigênio em exercício em cicloergômetro entre gestantes e não-gestantes e entre o exercício aquático e terrestre

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About