2002
DOI: 10.1590/s1415-47572002000300013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of seed-yield potential of common bean populations

Abstract: Earliest possible prediction of seed-yield potential of autogamous crop populations increases breeding program efficiency by saving time and resources. Alternatives for obtaining seed-yield predictions were compared by evaluating four common-bean populations in F 1 and F 2 generations together with the parents. Mean components (m + a' and d) and variances were estimated. The potential of each population was predicted by using both these and the Jinks and Pooni (1976) procedure, which allows probability estimat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The method of Jinks and Pooni (1976) allows for estimating the potential, given the mean and genetic variance of early generations, with examples in rice , common bean (Abreu et al, 2002), maize (Toledo and Miranda Filho, 1985), soybean (Toledo, 1987;Triller and Toledo, 1996) and wheat (Snape, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of Jinks and Pooni (1976) allows for estimating the potential, given the mean and genetic variance of early generations, with examples in rice , common bean (Abreu et al, 2002), maize (Toledo and Miranda Filho, 1985), soybean (Toledo, 1987;Triller and Toledo, 1996) and wheat (Snape, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve this goal it is desirable to use highly divergent parents which are not adapted to the desirable growing conditions. Under these conditions, the probability of obtaining a line better than those that already exist is quite small (Abreu et al, 2002). Thus, for advantages to be accumulated over the years the best alternative is to make a cross between lines with proven higher performance for the desirable traits (Rasmusson and Phillips, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bras., Brasília, v.44, n.10, p.1312Brasília, v.44, n.10, p. -1318Brasília, v.44, n.10, p. , out. 2009 sejam derivadas dessa população as melhores linhagens com relação ao porte, pois ela associa média alta e grande número de locos em heterozigose e maior variância entre as linhagens nas gerações sucessivas (F ∞ ) (Abreu et al, 2002).…”
unclassified