2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1414-40772010000300003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

As atitudes dos estudantes face à avaliação das instituições de ensino superior

Abstract: Apesar da sua importância para a avaliação das instituições de ensino superior, os estudantes parecem não constituir, ainda, um objecto de estudo relevante no campo da investigação sobre este processo de regulação institucional. Reconhecendo esta lacuna, o presente estudo pretende, através da análise das representações que os estudantes elaboram deste processo, indagar sobre os contornos que emolduram as suas atitudes relativamente ao mesmo. Recorre, neste sentido, ao enquadramento metodológico e aos resultado… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be related with the fact that academics are not always effectively integrated in the development of quality assurance procedures, namely those occurring within institutions (Loukkola and Zhang, 2010; Veiga et al , 2012). As assumed by Cardoso (2009), in the case of students, another institutional group experiencing difficulties in relation to their effective involvement in quality assessment, one can also presume that the “distance” of academics from the implementation “in the field” of assessment procedures contributes to a less positive idea of them, their aims and benefits, including for their very own academic work.…”
Section: Academics Resistance and Support To Quality Assurancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be related with the fact that academics are not always effectively integrated in the development of quality assurance procedures, namely those occurring within institutions (Loukkola and Zhang, 2010; Veiga et al , 2012). As assumed by Cardoso (2009), in the case of students, another institutional group experiencing difficulties in relation to their effective involvement in quality assessment, one can also presume that the “distance” of academics from the implementation “in the field” of assessment procedures contributes to a less positive idea of them, their aims and benefits, including for their very own academic work.…”
Section: Academics Resistance and Support To Quality Assurancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este resultado é superior ao encontrado no estudo original em que 67,4% dos inquiridos manifestam esta opinião, resultado semelhante ao encontrado por Brown (2008) no estudo 'Student Perceptions of Teaching Evaluations', no qual 67% dos estudantes consideraram que a avaliação deve ser feita uma vez por semestre. A percentagem mais elevada encontrada nos estudantes portugueses poderá estar associada à importância atribuída à avaliação, à experiência com esta forma de avaliação, ou à percepção que têm da qualidade da instituição de ensino que frequentam, tornando-se gratificante para eles serem chamados a participar nos processos institucionais, obtendo um lugar de relevância fundamental no ensino (CARDOSO et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Framed by previous arguments, the participation of students is currently seen to be relevant, among most European countries, at two major levels of the development of assessment -universities (internal level) and quality assessment systems (external level) (Cardoso, 2010;Cardoso & Santos, 2011;Froestad & Bakken, 2004). Despite the specificities assumed depending on the national context, the participation of students generally corresponds to (Cardoso, 2010): (1) integration into the institutional groups responsible for self-assessment and response to questionnaires on the teaching/learning process; (2) presence at meetings with external assessment panels; (3) collaboration in the definition and planning of assessment, namely through the presence in the bodies of the assessment agencies; (4) integration in the external assessment panels and contribution to the composition of the external assessment report; (5) contribution to the development of follow-up initiatives; and (6) involvement in the internal quality assurance systems.…”
Section: Students and Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking Portugal as reference case, one can state that the forms of student participation in the assessment of quality in higher education and universities, defined by the two legislative 3 configurations of the national quality assessment system, are very similar to those mentioned above. The only exception is that Portuguese students still do not participate in the external assessment panels and, therefore, do not contribute to the composition of those reports (Cardoso, 2009(Cardoso, , 2010.…”
Section: Students and Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%