Low-stakes assessment is supposed to improve educational practice by providing feedback to different actors in educational systems. However, the process of assessment from design to the point of a final impact on student learning outcomes is complex and diverse. It is hard to identify reasons for substandard achievement on assessments, let alone the means that should be undertaken to improve the educational setting. Furthermore, it is difficult to show a causal link between educational reforms and change in test achievement over time. This paper examines the potential impact that low-stakes testing initiatives have in engineering higher education on educational improvement by examining two case studies. It discusses how the design of constructs and particular assessment conditions may foster or limit educational improvement and outlines conditions to ensure that low-stakes assessment designs achieve educational improvement.
IntroductionHigher education continues to grow in significance and scale across the globe. As the number of programmes and graduates increases, there is a clear rationale for ensuring sufficient quality graduates who have acquired the necessary competencies to enter the workforce. Coupled with this push, there is increased regulation in the sector, with more regulatory bodies requiring more quantitative evidence that university and vocational graduates are reaching minimum standards.In order to react appropriately to these global and national developments, lowstakes assessment is intended to be a means for improving educational practice by feeding back information on learning results to different actors in educational systems. However, the process from assessment design to the test administration, to the analysis and reporting of results, followed by the respective reaction of educational stakeholders, to the point of a final impact on student learning outcomes, is complex and diverse. It is hard to identify reasons for substandard achievement on assessments, let alone the means that should be undertaken to improve the educational setting (Blaich and Wise 2011). Equally, it is difficult to show a causal link between educational reforms and change in test achievement over time (Black and William 1998).