2012
DOI: 10.1057/9781137284297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing Reform in Universities

Abstract: and a researcher at the Centre for Research in Higher Education Policies. He is a member of the editorial board of Quality Assurance in Education and Higher Education Dynamics.Sónia Cardoso is currently with the Development and Analysis Office of the Agency for Assessment and Accreditation of Higher Education, Portugal. She is a researcher at the Centre for Research in Higher Education Policies. She has written and published on the participation of students in quality activities in higher education.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 244 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the institutional level, the impact of assessment results on the agents' decisions towards improvement is only one of a variety of complex influences on organizational change (Stensaker 2012). Within these micro-political processes, it is difficult to promote results in a way that they become the foundation of strategic decisions, even when assessment has been conducted with great effort (Blaich and Wise 2011).…”
Section: Ii: Organizational Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the institutional level, the impact of assessment results on the agents' decisions towards improvement is only one of a variety of complex influences on organizational change (Stensaker 2012). Within these micro-political processes, it is difficult to promote results in a way that they become the foundation of strategic decisions, even when assessment has been conducted with great effort (Blaich and Wise 2011).…”
Section: Ii: Organizational Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the recent literature on management in HEIs has been dominated by the debate on collegiality and new managerialism (Clegg & McAuley, 2005;Ramirez & Tiplic, 2013;Stensaker, Välimaa, Henkel, & Sarrico, 2012), and the literature review for the thesis took place within that context. In conducting the literature review, it emerged that with idea of the advent of Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) and new managerialism, the role of the academic in HE is changing which appears to be a particularly interesting development when juxtaposed against the rising influence of the non-academic professional manager in HE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%