2009
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-35552009005000061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atuação da fisioterapia na síndrome de fragilidade: revisão sistemática

Abstract: Objective: To carry out a systematic review of the literature on physical therapy interventions and their effect on frail community-dwelling elders. Methods: Systematic review of studies published until June 2008 in the databases Medline, Embase, PEDro, SciELO, LILACS and Cochrane Library. We excluded studies with samples composed of institutionalized, hospitalized and non-frail participants, studies not aimed at treating frailty, and studies that were not specifically related to physical therapy. Results: In … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 The study of this condition is therefore of major importance, as it can lead to a reduction in the expectancy for a healthy life and the impairment of the autonomy and independence of the elderly, and hence, a deterioration in quality of life (QOL) 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1,2 The study of this condition is therefore of major importance, as it can lead to a reduction in the expectancy for a healthy life and the impairment of the autonomy and independence of the elderly, and hence, a deterioration in quality of life (QOL) 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is an event whose effects extend beyond the elderly themselves, placing a burden on relatives and caregivers, and resulting in high health service costs. 3,6 According to Borges & Menezes, 7 some authors consider only physical indicators when defining frailty among the elderly, while others include cognitive, psychological and environmental criteria. Although there is some heterogeneity, currently the most commonly used definition of the frailty syndrome among the scientific community is that proposed by Fried et al 4 which considers it to be "a clinical and multifactorial syndrome characterized by a reduction in energy reserves and reduced resistance to stressors, resulting from the cumulative decline of physiological systems".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is no consensus in the literature regarding the definition of frailty, 2,8,[23][24][25] some evidences suggest that non-intentional weight loss, muscle strength decrease, fatigue, physical activity reduction, gait speed reduction, immobility due to fractures after accidental falls (especially of ilium and femur), chronic diseases, and polypharmacy are all markers of frailty syndrome in elderly individuals. 5,7,26,27 Regarding the performance of the tests applied along this study, the TUG execution time, which was superior to 10 seconds, identified that the elderly subjects may begin to have balance problems, once independent subjects, without balance problems complete the TUG in less than 10 seconds.…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, a systematic review, 7 reports that there is little evidence about the effects of interventions or preventions for frail elderly who live in the community, what is associated with the small number of studies and the lack of standardization in the classification of frailty syndrome. This review emphasizes that it was possible to find concordance among muscle strength gain, balance and functional capacity, however, it was not possible to suggest a treatment program that was efficient for stopping or reverse the progression of the frailty syndrome.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, there were studies that only focused on the prevalence or incidence of health problem events (I) (12)(13)27,32,45,(47)(48)67,81,(83)(84)(85)(86)90,92) ; others to iden fy and/or associate risk factors (II) ( ; and s ll others to correlate interven ons with preven on, prophylaxis or reduc on of events (III) (14)(15)(17)(18)20,23,33,46,(50)(51)(53)(54)(55)58,62,(64)(65)(68)(69)(70)(71)(72)(73)(74)(75)(76)(79)(80)82,89,91,(93)(94) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%