2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-84782009000100039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semeadoras-adubadoras em semeadura convencional de soja

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The values obtained for normal distribution were below the capacity of the pneumatic seeder, wh ich should have as target 90% of normal spacing (Tourino et al, 2009;Melo et al, 2013;Weirich Neto et al, 2015) wh ich makes it possible to classify the quality of the seeder as good (75 to 90%) and bad for the crops (25 to 50%).…”
Section: Res Ults and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The values obtained for normal distribution were below the capacity of the pneumatic seeder, wh ich should have as target 90% of normal spacing (Tourino et al, 2009;Melo et al, 2013;Weirich Neto et al, 2015) wh ich makes it possible to classify the quality of the seeder as good (75 to 90%) and bad for the crops (25 to 50%).…”
Section: Res Ults and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This situation can be explained by the fact that the lines intersect in cross-seeding system, with the greatest amount of distributed seeds when compared to the conventional system, having greater potential to avoid increasing the percentage of flawed spacings. Tourino et al (2009) reported that the seeders pneumatic systems may favor the reduction of flawed spacing and hence provide conditions for establishing more uniform plant stands, possibly reflecting in increased productivity. This result has contrast with the values obtained in the present study, despite the fact that the seeder-fertilizer also has pneumatic seed suction mechanism, since the percentage of flawed spacings can be considered high for both seeding systems evaluated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pneumatic seed metering mechanism can provide a better distribution of seeds (TOURINO et al, 2009), less damage, better adjustment and better accuracy (ZHAN et al, 2010). Li et al (2012) highlighted the flexibility of the use with different types and sizes of seeds, with more precise dosing rates, less damage to the seed, better control and adaptation and a larger application spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%