2006
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-21002006000200001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Níveis de evidência

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
104

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
39
0
104
Order By: Relevance
“…ISI 20 09 Japan Ef fect of t he interaction between mental stress and eating pattern on body mass index gain in healthy Japanese male workers. Toyoshima et al ( 19) Cohort (5 years) Stress and eating habits were not signif icantly correlated. In people with a high stress leve l, t he increase in BMI was signif icantly higher in people that ate too much.…”
Section: Medlinementioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ISI 20 09 Japan Ef fect of t he interaction between mental stress and eating pattern on body mass index gain in healthy Japanese male workers. Toyoshima et al ( 19) Cohort (5 years) Stress and eating habits were not signif icantly correlated. In people with a high stress leve l, t he increase in BMI was signif icantly higher in people that ate too much.…”
Section: Medlinementioning
confidence: 89%
“…High job demands are found to cause stress in workers (4.3%) (13,15,19) and increase the need and desire to eat (17.4%) (15) , however, in non-obese people, this need has not been observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assim, Para organizar e sumarizar as informações, que compreende a terceira etapa da revisão integrativa, foi utilizado um formulário adaptado (10) , que contempla os seguintes itens: número do artigo, portal ou base consultada, dados do artigo, objetivos, método, resultados, conclusões/ considerações finais, recomendações (dos autores), identificação de limites ou vieses, síntese do estudo e nível de evidência (11) .…”
Section: Métodounclassified
“…In this integrative review, the following classification of level of evidence was adopted: level 1 -evidence from a systematic review or meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials or evidence derived from clinical guidelines based on systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials; level 2 -evidence from at least one well delineated randomised controlled trial; level 3 -evidence from well-designed clinical trials without randomization; level 4 -evidence from cohort and case-control well delineated trials; level 5 -evidence from a systematic review of descriptive and qualitative studies; level 6 -evidence from a descriptive or qualitative study and; level 7 -evidence from the opinions of authorities and /or reports by expert committees (7). Knowledge of this evidence classification in publications related to the ICF system is crucial to be able to critically assess the results derived from these surveys, assisting in decision-making about the incorporation of evidence into clinical practice (8).…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%