2003
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-86502003000100012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avaliação de descritores na angiologia e cirurgia vascular em artigos publicados em dois periódicos nacionais

Abstract: A recuperação de referências na literatura biomédica está normatizada pelos Descritores em Ciências da Saúde (DeCS), contudo os autores de artigos científicos nem sempre obedecem ao regulamentado, o que causa dificuldade a localização da informação. Os autores avaliaram os Descritores em Ciências da Saúde em artigos de dois periódicos nacionais, na angiologia e cirurgia vascular no período de 1995 a 2000 em relação a adequada utilização dos descritores de acordo com a listagem do DeCS 2001 e do MeSH 1994. Fora… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also possible to detect that many mistakenly used key words have only a part of it wrong and not the whole key word, as, for example, "anastomosis" which was used instead of "surgical anastomosis" (Figure 2). Only 579 (13.68%) key words were not in the MeSH database, which is a value considered low in relation to the work of Oliveira et al 13 and Rosas 1 , who found 56.23% and 53% nonindexed key words, respectively. This demonstrates the importance given to key words by the journal's editorial board and also on the part of researchers who submit their articles to this journal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also possible to detect that many mistakenly used key words have only a part of it wrong and not the whole key word, as, for example, "anastomosis" which was used instead of "surgical anastomosis" (Figure 2). Only 579 (13.68%) key words were not in the MeSH database, which is a value considered low in relation to the work of Oliveira et al 13 and Rosas 1 , who found 56.23% and 53% nonindexed key words, respectively. This demonstrates the importance given to key words by the journal's editorial board and also on the part of researchers who submit their articles to this journal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…showing that the authors realized the importance of using key words to make it easier to find the article and facilitate its citation 13 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Como referiram Oliveira et al (2003), a busca pela informação científica disponível na literatura pode se tornar improdutiva ou confusa sem uma compreensão básica de como o conhecimento é organizado ou indexado.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…A work published in 2003 by OLIVEIRA et al assessed the use of DeCS in two national periodicals in angiology and vascular surgery between 1995 and 2000 and showed that most of terms employed (56.3%) were not included in DeCS 2001 or in MeSH 1994. The authors concluded that new terms must be added to DeCS to accompany the development of specialties and that medical societies must encourage the search for terms in DeCS, as well as promoting a dialogue between BIREME and these societies and post graduation courses [4].…”
Section: Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%