2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-86502012000500012
| View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the key words used in Acta Cirurgica Brasileira from 1997 to 2012. METHODS: All the key words of all articles published in regular issues between 1997 and 2012 were analyzed, ensuring that these key words were in the MeSH database (Medical Subjects Headings) and the most used subject headings and most wrong repeated key words were ranked. RESULTS: > 4230 key words used in 990 articles were analyzed. Only 579 key words (13.68%) were not in the MeSH database, considering that there was a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that the total amount of the Exact match, Relatively Match and Not Match keywords of articles of selected journals are 39.5%, 35.7% and 24.8% respectively that generally indicates the degree of Exact match is not at a high level. The findings of the studies of Botelho & Teixeira [12], Teixeira and colleagues [13] found inconsistent results with the study. They argued that the use of keywords out of MeSH is not consistent with policy of journal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The results showed that the total amount of the Exact match, Relatively Match and Not Match keywords of articles of selected journals are 39.5%, 35.7% and 24.8% respectively that generally indicates the degree of Exact match is not at a high level. The findings of the studies of Botelho & Teixeira [12], Teixeira and colleagues [13] found inconsistent results with the study. They argued that the use of keywords out of MeSH is not consistent with policy of journal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…A busca se torna ainda mais difícil para leigos, acadêmicos e pesquisadores que possuam escassa experiência, o que torna laborioso o acesso à literatura específica (FRAZIER et al, 2015). Tendo em vista esta problemática, faz-se necessário que os autores facilitem o achado de seus estudos, uma vez que é o acesso da comunidade científica que torna real a contribuição de uma publicação científica (TEIXEIRA et al, 2012).…”
Section: Considerações Finaisunclassified