2006
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-81752006000400007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Borboletas (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea e Hesperioidea) do Parque Estadual do Espinilho e entorno, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil

Abstract: O presente trabalho apresenta uma relação das espécies de borboletas que ocorrem no Parque Estadual do Espinilho (30°11'S, 57°30'W) e entorno no extremo sudoeste do Rio Grande do Sul. Foram realizadas quatro expedições a campo, com duração de cinco dias cada, entre março de 2003 e janeiro de 2004. As amostragens contemplaram áreas com vegetação de Savana Estépica Parque e Mata Ciliar dentro dos limites do parque e entorno. Foi elaborada uma listagem com 97 espécies de borboletas, havendo 10 novos registros par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
1
14

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(12 reference statements)
2
8
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study Nymphalidae was the richest family, similar to data obtained in studies conducted in Santa Maria (Dessuy and Morais 2007;Sack and Morais 2008), Espinilho State Park and surrounding area (Marchiori and Romanowski 2006), Maquiné (Iserhard and Romanowski 2004), Minas Gerais (Silva et al 2007) and Distrito Federal (Emery et al 2006). The most abundant subfamilies of Nymphalidae were Nymphalinae (n = 319) and Heliconiinae (n = 300), similar to data obtained by Quadros et al (2004) in the Coastal Plain of Rio Grande do Sul.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study Nymphalidae was the richest family, similar to data obtained in studies conducted in Santa Maria (Dessuy and Morais 2007;Sack and Morais 2008), Espinilho State Park and surrounding area (Marchiori and Romanowski 2006), Maquiné (Iserhard and Romanowski 2004), Minas Gerais (Silva et al 2007) and Distrito Federal (Emery et al 2006). The most abundant subfamilies of Nymphalidae were Nymphalinae (n = 319) and Heliconiinae (n = 300), similar to data obtained by Quadros et al (2004) in the Coastal Plain of Rio Grande do Sul.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Several regions do not even have any list of species, or if there is one, it is incomplete, outdated or made using different or not explicit methodologies (Isehard and Romanowski 2004). Recent studies concerning the fauna of butterflies in Rio Grande do Sul characterized study locations and employed methodology more accurately, facilitating comparisons among studies and contributing to knowledge on the geographical distribution of the Neotropical butterflies (Teston and Corseuil 1998;2000a;Iserhard and Romanowski 2004;Quadros et al 2004, Marchiori andRomanowski 2006;Dessuy and Morais 2007;Giovenardi et al 2008;Paz et al 2008;Sack and Morais 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este padrão é encontrado, também, em outros inventários na Mata Atlântica brasileira (Brown 1992, Mielke & Casagrande 1998, Brown & Freitas 2000a, b, Santos et al 2008, Dolibaina et al 2011, Francini et al 2011. Mesmo que este inventário tenha obtido um alto esforço amostral com armadilhas para a captura exclusiva de borboletas frugívoras da família Nymphalidae, sugere-se que da fauna regional (Marchiori & Romanowski 2006). Torna-se necessário a divulgação deste tipo de publicação para que estudos ecológicos futuros possam ser adequadamente elaborados e bem conduzidos.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…This pattern was also reported in other relatively complete inventories in the Neotropics, showing Hesperiidae as the best represented butterfly group in any well surveyed locality, followed by the Nymphalidae (Brown & Freitas 2000b). However, in short term studies with low sampling effort there has been a clear numerical dominance of Nymphalidae (Motta 2002;Iserhard & Romanowski 2004;Duarte & Almeida 2006;Marchiori & Romanowski 2006), likely due to the fact that they are easily captured and identified in the field. The Hesperiidae, Lycaenidae and Riodinidae, all including many small and inconspicuous species, require more effort to be adequately sampled.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%