2010
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-41612010000200001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of conditional cash transfer programmes on adult labour supply: an empirical analysis using a time-series-cross-section sample of brazilian municipalities

Abstract: ResumoNeste trabalho, estimamos os efeitos dos Programas Condicionais de Transferência de Renda (PCTR), no Brasil, sobre a oferta de trabalho de mulheres e homens adultos. Para tanto, utilizamos o painel de municípios que são continuamente cobertos pela Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios (PNAD/ IBGE) durante o período entre 2001 e 2005. Os efeitos dos PCTR brasileiros são estimados tanto sobre a taxa de participação quanto sobre o número médio de horas trabalhadas. Como a PNAD não investiga diretament… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
1
9

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(8 reference statements)
1
40
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of Mexico, Skoufias and Di Maro (2008) exploiting the experimental deign of the cash transfer programme PROGRESA found no significant effect on adult labour force participation and leisure time, but substantial reduction in poverty. Foguel and de Barros (2010) found positive effects of a conditional cash transfer programme on male labour participation in Brazil. Similar results were found by Barrientos and Villa (2013) using data from Colombia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the case of Mexico, Skoufias and Di Maro (2008) exploiting the experimental deign of the cash transfer programme PROGRESA found no significant effect on adult labour force participation and leisure time, but substantial reduction in poverty. Foguel and de Barros (2010) found positive effects of a conditional cash transfer programme on male labour participation in Brazil. Similar results were found by Barrientos and Villa (2013) using data from Colombia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A subsequent study by Ferro, Kassouf and Levison (2010) found similar results: the programme led to an increase in the economic participation of mothers and fathers in urban areas but had no significant effects in rural areas. Foguel and Paes de Barros (2010) find that the programme had null effects on the economic participation of women and a small impact among men. Regarding the number of hours worked, they find a negative effect of minor magnitude for women and no significant effects for men.…”
Section: Empirical Evidence For Latin American Countriesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…It can be stated, based on a large amount of evidence, that there is no empirical support to sustain the work-disincentive hypothesis. [Oliveira and Soares, 2012:30] In addition to Oliveira and Soares (2012), a range of other studies indicate that there is no significant effect of the Bolsa Família on the labor supply of adult relatives, either from the statistical point of view or from the degree of magnitude (Ferro et al, 2010;Chitolina et al, 2016;Foguel and Barros, 2010;Soares, 2012). Most of the findings are related to the reduction of the number of working hours, especially by mothers and women.…”
Section: The Bolsa Família Programmentioning
confidence: 99%