2018
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2018000100005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptability and phenotypic stability of sugarcane clones

Abstract: The objective of this work was to select superior sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) clones with good stability and adaptability, considering the genotype x environment interaction in two productive cycles. Twenty-five early clones plus five control clones were evaluated during two cuts (ratoon cane and plant cane) in 24 environments. A randomized complete block design was used, with three replicates. Tons of stems per hectare and tons of pol per hectare were evaluated. To verify adaptability and stability, the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first and second principal component analyses accounted for 45.5% and 24.7% of the G × E, respectively, together explained 70.2% of the total variation (Table 3). This was in agreement with Mattos et al (2013); Regis et al (2018) suggested that G × E pattern is collected in the first two principal component analyses. Similarly, previous studies also suggested the importance of capturing most of the G × E sum squares in the first two principal component axis to attain accurate information (Crossa et al, 1990; Purchase et al, 2000).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The first and second principal component analyses accounted for 45.5% and 24.7% of the G × E, respectively, together explained 70.2% of the total variation (Table 3). This was in agreement with Mattos et al (2013); Regis et al (2018) suggested that G × E pattern is collected in the first two principal component analyses. Similarly, previous studies also suggested the importance of capturing most of the G × E sum squares in the first two principal component axis to attain accurate information (Crossa et al, 1990; Purchase et al, 2000).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Those genotypes G24 (Co 88025), G23 (CoV 94101), and G20 (Co 16001) with high mean yield and large PCA1 scores resulted in specific adaptation to the favorable environments. These were also detected by Meena et al 2017 andRegis et al 2018 in sugarcane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…, UshaRani et al (2017) andRegis et al (2018) who suggested that GEI pattern is collected in the first principal components of analysis. Average cane yield recorded 102.28 t/ha and 65.26 t/ha for II plant crop and ratoon, respectively (table 5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is more difficult to determine experimental accuracy for the traits TPH and TCH. The coefficients of variation for these traits usually have medium magnitude [38]. In contrast, the coefficients of variation for the traits FIB (%), CP (%), PT (%), SSC (%), and TRS (Kg) have low magnitude [37].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%