2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2009000200007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological, pedigree, and molecular distances and their association with hybrid wheat performance

Abstract: -The objectives of this work were to estimate the genetic distance among wheat genotypes using morphological, pedigree, molecular, and combined morphological and molecular measures, to determine the correlations between these measures, and to evaluate the combining ability of the genotypes. Three generations and two planting designs were studied. Six wheat genotypes were crossed using a diallel design. The F 1 , F 2 and F 3 generations were evaluated in the fi eld, in the crop seasons of 2003, 2004 and 2005, u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This confirmed that the selected parents and their respective hybrid combinations were contrasting. No significant differences were detected for generations, as has been reported by Bertan et al (2009). However, the generation effect showed interactions with treatment and with GCA and SCA.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…This confirmed that the selected parents and their respective hybrid combinations were contrasting. No significant differences were detected for generations, as has been reported by Bertan et al (2009). However, the generation effect showed interactions with treatment and with GCA and SCA.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Besides providing a better understanding of the organization of germplasm and improving the efficiency in the sampling of genotypes, knowledge of the genetic distance also allows the selection of biologically oriented crossings (Vieira et al, 2007;Bertan et al, 2009), resulting in obtaining the segregating progenies with high genetic variability for selection (Marić et al, 2004). This genetic variability available in segregating populations is essential for breeding programs, because besides increasing the chance of identifying superior genotypes it is directly related to the genetic gain obtained by artificial selection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples can be found in studies conducted with tomato (Gonçalves et al, 2008) and wheat (Marić et al, 2004;Vieira et al, 2007;Bertan et al, 2009), where the highest correlation coefficient was found between combined analysis and molecular data. However, when conducting a comparative analysis between the degree of polymorphism revealed by molecular markers in different studies, it is verified that the values ranged from 68 to 93.2% in the studies mentioned above, while in the present study this level of polymorphism was significantly lower (27.5%), resulting in a low correlation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strong influence of the descriptors, which were the most abundant in the dissimilarity matrix, was also observed by Bertan et al (2009), while studying genetic diversity in wheat. These authors observed a low correlation (r = 0.05) between the morphological and molecular data (AFLP) but a high correlation (r = 0.65) between combined (morpho-agronomic and molecular) and molecular data.…”
Section: Correlations Between Dissimilarity Matrices From Morpho-agromentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Exploitation of this genetic variability may strengthen the genetic basis of this crop through the development of new lines and hybrids, given that the reproductive system of papaya enables crosses and that the absence of inbreeding depression makes it possible to obtain lines with high vigor (Oliveira et al, 2010a). Knowledge of genetic variability is very useful for identifying the best combinations between genotypes with the potential to maximize the genetic gains made by hybridization (Máric et al, 2004;Bertan et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%